The pro-choice view survives on widespread ignorance of biology
[Esta publicación está disponible en español aquí.]
Through Secular Pro-life I frequently post content about how the human zygote is the first stage of a human being’s life cycle. Often when I point this fact out, people will suggest I’m strawmanning the pro-choice view. They assert that no one really denies the basic biology; the important issues to the abortion debate are personhood [i.e. yes the fetus is biologically human but is she philosophically a “person”?] and bodily rights.
But the longer I participate in the abortion debate, the more strongly I suspect that most people actually care more about the biology than the rest.
[For any readers who genuinely don’t already know: human sperm and human ova (eggs) are gametes (sex cells). They are not organisms. They are haploid cells (typically have 23 chromosomes each) created through a process called meiosis. A human organism is formed through fertilization; the sperm enters the egg to create a diploid cell (typically 46 chromosomes). This cell is called the zygote and it now multiplies through mitosis. Fertilization is a specific event that marks the transition from multiple gametes to a single organism and from meiosis to mitosis. These are basic biological facts. Read more here.]
To begin with, I’ve had so many debates with countless people who make 100% false assertions in defense of their pro-choice views. Here are some real examples of assertions people have made over the years:
- Sperm are organisms
- Gametes are organisms
- Neurons are organisms
- Skin cells are organisms
- Literally all cells are organisms
- Embryos are made of “non-living” cells
- Embryos don’t have heartbeats
- Embryos don’t have hearts at all
- Heartbeat doesn’t begin until several months into the pregnancy
- Consciousness is defined as breathing air outside with working lungs
- Human life cycles have no specific beginnings or ends
- Human embryos are analogous to unfertilized chicken eggs
- Human sperm are analogous to frog tadpoles
- If abortion kills humans, masturbation is genocide
- If abortion kills humans, blow jobs are cannibalism
- If abortion kills humans, menstruation is murder
- If an embryo is a human organism, so is snot. Or poop.
- The idea “the zygote is the first stage of a human’s life cycle” is not supported by science
- The idea “the zygote is the first stage of a human’s life cycle” is a religious view
- The idea “the zygote is the first stage of a human’s life cycle” is a hotly contested view among many different and equally valid views in embryology
- The embryology textbook I shared with them is propaganda
- The embryology textbook I shared with them is a religious source
And so on.
I try to be careful not to give too much weight to comments from random people online. It’s a pet peeve of mine when “news” articles allege a new controversial view among a subset of Americans only for the author’s evidence to be screencaps of five otherwise ignored Tweets. You can find anything on the internet, so try not to over-extrapolate.
But the views I’m describing above are a lot easier to find than the 278th comment under a YouTube video. For example here’s a gamete/organisms equivocation that got over 40,000 retweets:
In addition to the countless and popular anecdotes, a recent dissertation out of the University of Chicago (which I’ve summarized in detail elsewhere) found that most Americans think “When does human life begin?” is (1) an important question (2) that people deserve to know the answer to so they can be informed about their reproductive decisions (3) that is best answered by biologists because (4) it’s an objective issue that can be informed by scientific knowledge. And of the Americans who chose biologists as the authority best suited to answer this question, 56% believed the biologists’ answer would strengthen the pro-choice side of the debate! (In fact the biologists affirmed that human life begins at fertilization.)
In other words, in the abortion debate, biology is important to most people, and yet a whole lot of them have no idea what the facts actually are.
This widespread ignorance bolsters the pro-choice side, and that’s why, I think, some abortion rights activists work so hard to obscure the biological reality. Last year multiple activists claimed (completely incorrectly) that embryos don’t have heartbeats. When states have passed laws requiring doctors to provide information on fetal development or offer the woman the option to view her ultrasound or hear the heartbeat, pro-choicers have described these regulations as restrictions on abortion. We’ve seen alleged experts muddle the lines between their political views and the scientific facts over and over and over.
If the general public already understood the basic biology and cared only about philosophical issues, abortion rights advocates wouldn’t need to do this song and dance. But people do care and don’t know about biology, and that’s why I’m going to keep repeating myself: the fetus is a human organism, and abortion kills humans.
- The Scientific Consensus On When Life Begins (scientific articles and texts affirming a human life begins at fertilization) – Illinois Right to Life
- A pro-life response to “The unscientific nature of the concept that ‘human life begins at fertilization,’ and why it matters” – The Fetal Position
- A Scientific View of When Life Begins – The Charlotte Lozier Institute
- Pro-Choice Concedes – quotes from abortion providers and other PC organizations acknowledging abortion destroys live humans – Human Defense
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!