Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview of SPL
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum
      • FAQ
      • Presentations overview
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Our miscarried children weren’t parasites.

July 23, 2022/0 Comments/in Biology, Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

(Transcript below video.)

 [Esta publicación está disponible en español aquí.]

@secular_pro_life

Suggesting embryos are parasites is scientifically inaccurate and harmful to people mourning their miscarried children. #secularprolife #miscarriage #pregnancyloss #abortion #parasite #biology #embryology #lossparent #prolife #prochoice #proabortion #greenscreen

♬ original sound – SPL

Transcript:

When pro-choice people conceptualize the embryo as a parasite, and pathologize pregnancy as our body’s failure to rid ourselves of a parasite, there’s another element of that discourse that I want to touch on. And that is how this kind of framing affects people who have experienced pregnancy loss.

I have miscarried two children. I grieved them deeply. I still grieve them and when it happened, I joined pregnancy loss groups and I talked with a lot of people I know who had also miscarried their children.

And it quickly became clear that one of the running themes of pregnancy loss in addition to grief is feeling stupid. There are a lot of people out there who don’t understand their grief and feel that their grief must be dramatic or misplaced because they are so heartbroken over the loss of their early embryonic children, and society tells us that that’s just a meaningless clump of cells.

But the parasite narrative is even worse, because instead of it being this amorphous clump of cells that there’s no particular reason to feel any particular attachment to, the embryo is actually our enemy? So if we miscarry our bodies are doing their jobs very very well? I can hardly underscore how unbelievably ignorant and destructive that narrative is for people who are struggling with pregnancy loss or with infertility.

Another really common theme for people who have miscarried is feeling like it’s their fault. Feeling if they had just behaved a little bit differently, or even if they had been a better person, in some cases, then they wouldn’t have lost their children.

This is inaccurate, of course. Medical professionals are quick to reassure parents that there was nothing they could have done differently. And the majority of the time we don’t know exactly why miscarriage happens, but a lot of times it has to do with genetic issues that you just have no control over. Still, for many people, their grief is compounded by the feelings of foolishness and then feelings of guilt.

They also tend to feel incredibly alienated and lonely, even though pregnancy loss is very common. I knew when I spoke publicly about losing my children that people I have known years would privately let me know that they had gone through the same thing and never told me. And that is exactly what happened.

So maybe keep all of those grieving parents in mind when you’re saying things like this:

Or when you’re describing our lost children like this:

Or when you’re acting as if the deaths of our children mean we are victorious in battle?

Biologically speaking, embryos are not parasites, but in addition to being scientifically inaccurate, the narrative is very harmful for a lot of people trying to process the children that they’ve lost. There are some decent pro-choice arguments but this isn’t one of them.

If you want to hear more about the scientific illiteracy, I did a video called “no, embryos aren’t parasites” and you can find it on our [tiktok] channel. You can also read about some of the research on how people process miscarriage here on our blog.

[Read more – Our cultural gaslighting of women who miscarry before 20 weeks]

If you appreciate our work and would like to help, one of the most effective ways to do so is to become a monthly donor. You can also give a one time donation here or volunteer with us here.

Related Posts

Tags: anti-science
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2019.05.17-georgiamariexo.png?fit=1080%2C1024&ssl=1 1024 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2022-07-23 05:51:002024-09-25 09:53:32Our miscarried children weren’t parasites.
You might also like
I Award You No Points.
Debunking the latest pro-abortion “science” video
NPR interviews abortion rights activists to determine if embryos have hearts
Biology textbook writer claims we need emotion to answer “When does human life begin?”
Response to article in “The Humanist”
The pro-choice view survives on widespread ignorance of biology
A Tragic Parallel
Human Beings Begin as Zygotes: Refutations to 8 Common Pro-Choice Arguments
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Anti-Abortion Should Be Anti-Censorship Kentucky Judge Rejects Modern Science, Blocks Abortion Ban
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.