Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview of SPL
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum
      • Fetal Remains Disposition Protocol
      • FAQ handout
      • Presentations overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
      • Your experiences with processing abortion
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Anti-Abortion Should Be Anti-Censorship

July 22, 2022/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

Once in a while, I find myself agreeing with pro-choicers about something. Today is one of those days, thanks to an incredibly stupid incident from American University School of Law.

It all started with the leak of the Dobbs opinion. Law students began discussing it in a group chat. American University was once ranked the most liberal college in the United States, and while there are of course pro-life liberals, they were not plentiful in this group chat. Pro-abortion students expressed dismay, suggested that conservatives would next reverse Loving v. Virginia, and used a few profanities. A lonely Republican in the chat politely pushed back against the claim that conservatives are against civil rights, and was promptly told to “shut the f*** up.”

Was it the quality of discourse you’d hope to see from a top law school? No. But was it protected First Amendment speech? Absolutely yes.

If only it had ended there. But alas, our pro-life friend complained to the university administration. The other students in the chat soon received a message that they were under investigation for “harassment on the basis of political affiliation and religious beliefs.”

*deep breath*

BEING PRO-LIFE IS NOT A RELIGIOUS BELIEF! STOP PLAYING INTO THEIR HANDS, WITH THEIR “THEOCRACY” NARRATIVE, BY CONFLATING YOUR CHURCH WITH A GIANT HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT! YOU ARE NOT HELPING, YOU TWERP!

*deep breath*

Look, I get it. Abortion supporters censor us all the time; shouldn’t they get a taste of their own medicine? Especially when they’re spouting deliberate misinformation about things like ectopic pregnancy, the desire to just shut them up can be quite tempting.

But we have to be principled. We are right. We have science on our side. If the exchange of ideas is truly open, we can win. Stooping to their level by relying on censorship is unacceptable.

Thankfully, this story has a happy ending. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression got involved, and American University dropped the investigation six weeks later. But come on: there never should have been an investigation in the first place.

[Photo credit: Kristina Flour on Unsplash]

Related Posts

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/kristina-flour-BcjdbyKWquw-unsplash-scaled.jpg?fit=2560%2C1638&ssl=1 1638 2560 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2022-07-22 05:09:002022-07-19 20:47:25Anti-Abortion Should Be Anti-Censorship
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

I’m an emergency physician. Pro-life laws don’t threaten my pat... Woman with stethoscope Our miscarried children weren’t parasites.
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}

Subscribe for Livestream Updates and More

* indicates required

Interests

Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.