Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Bridges
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Mississippi Personhood Amendment

September 14, 2011/3 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Matthew Newman
Following a court decision to allow it, this fall voters in Mississippi will get to decide on whether to approve or disapprove an amendment to their state constitution that will define a person as “… every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning, or the functional equivalent thereof.” A “Personhood” amendment as it is most commonly called, has been tried in a few other states in the past.
Here’s the official website for the organization which supports the amendment in Mississippi. The question I have for our readers is – what do you think of this approach? What do you think the outcome of this amendment will be in Mississippi? Opponents say that this will ban birth control; supporters say that this will only prohibit abortions and protect unborn lives.

Related Posts

Tags: personhood amendment, sex education & contraception
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Matthew Newman https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Matthew Newman2011-09-14 16:06:002021-11-08 12:54:30Mississippi Personhood Amendment
You might also like
Pro-abortion group: Let’s get away from discussing abortion
News bulletin
Does the “16 & Pregnant” franchise decrease teen birth rates?
Book Review: “Sex Ed for Everyone”
New PP report shows increased abortion, decreased everything else
What abortion advocates really think of the woman “exercising choice”
Can I be a feminist too?
The dying gasps of an industry
3 replies
  1. Steven Ertelt
    Steven Ertelt says:
    September 14, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    The amendment will likely be overturned in court after the vote because you change amend the Bill of Rights in Mississippi. Even if the amendment was constitutional on those grounds, it would be overturned as violating Roe. It's just putting the cart before the horse. You can't expect a pro-abortion Supreme Court to uphold a pro-life amendment, the courts must be changed first. Amendment supporters should instead spend their time defeating Obama and electing a pro-life Senate if they truly want to ban abortions. Otherwise they're spinning their wheels. More at http://www.lifenews.com/2011/09/09/mississippi-abortion-personhood-amendment-gets-november-vote/

    Log in to Reply
  2. Kelsey
    Kelsey says:
    September 14, 2011 at 4:58 pm

    I agree with Steven. Personhood advocates do have good intentions, but ultimately, incrementalism is the only approach that's saved any lives.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Marysia
    Marysia says:
    September 15, 2011 at 6:21 pm

    Whether unborn children are legally defined as persons or not, whether and to what extent abortion is legal/illegal-abortions will continue on a wide scale as long as women do not have other and better, substantive alternatives. Provided not simply through piecemeal individual charity, but robustly and publicly funded supports in family planning, health care, and everything else needed to prevent unintended pregnancies and get through & beyond any that occur. This personhood amendment is empty. It does not have these supports written right into it. If unborn children are to be treated as persons in actual effect-women need to be treated as fullfledged persons in deed.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Life Matters Journal releases its first issue True or False: Planned Parenthood Reduces Unplanned Pregnancies
Scroll to top