Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview of SPL
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum
      • Fetal Remains Disposition Protocol
      • FAQ handout
      • Presentations overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
      • Your experiences with processing abortion
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

The truth about North Carolina’s new sex ed legislation

March 1, 2013/5 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

NARAL’s North Carolina affiliate is up in arms about “a shocking new legislative attack on reproductive rights.” The source of their fury? A proposal (SB 132) to add to the health curriculum in schools. If the measure passes, sex ed classes will include information about the link between abortion and preterm birth, which NARAL North Carolina calls “propaganda” and “unsubstantiated lies.”

Here’s a little more information about the abortion-preterm birth link, from (sarcasm alert) the well-known anti-choice propagandists at the New York Times (end sarcasm alert):

Induced abortions may raise the risk for very preterm birth
in subsequent pregnancies, a new study reports.

Researchers reviewed the records of 300,858 first-time
mothers who had single babies in Finland from 1996 to 2008, comparing the data
with a registry of induced abortions from 1983 to 2008. The analysis appeared online Wednesday in the journal Human Reproduction.

After controlling for smoking, a history of miscarriage,
socioeconomic level and other factors, the investigators found that the risk
for very preterm birth — that is, birth at 28 or fewer weeks of gestation —
increased with the number of previous abortions a woman had had: a 19 percent
increase after one abortion, 69 percent for two, and 278 percent for three.

They also found increased risks for preterm birth (less than
37 weeks of gestation) and for low birth weight, but only in women who had three
or more abortions.

The authors caution that unknown variables could have
influenced their findings, and that their observational study does not
establish cause and effect. Still, they believe that the finding could be
explained by infections that sometimes occur before or after surgery for
abortion.

“The risk is low,” said the lead author, Reija Klemetti, a
researcher at the Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare, “and
abortion is a safe surgical procedure. But having more than two can have
consequences, and this information should be included in sexual education
programs.”

That isn’t the only study substantiating the link, of course. But it is one of the better ones, since registry-based studies eliminate recall bias.

NARAL North Carolina says that we “should trust our children with the truth.” I couldn’t agree more. And that’s why pro-science North Carolinians should support SB 132.

Related Posts

Tags: sex education & contraception
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2013-03-01 14:33:002021-11-08 12:38:03The truth about North Carolina’s new sex ed legislation
You might also like
“Just don’t have sex”
One step forward, one step back
Scatterbrained Sunday
Scatterbrained Sunday
Have To Face It
Pro-choice states have just as many unintended pregnancies, and far more abortions
Does the “16 & Pregnant” franchise decrease teen birth rates?
Action Alert: Stop the Birth Control Mandate
5 replies
  1. S. Hitler
    S. Hitler says:
    March 2, 2013 at 9:49 am

    Funny how this group disavows its connections to the Catholic Church while working overtime to sell off (lie about) the validity of all of the anti-contraception studies that the church helped create.

    Log in to Reply
  2. scooter lib
    scooter lib says:
    March 2, 2013 at 9:27 pm

    You need to teach these kids, especially girls, that the only way to make sure that they don't die from an abortion is to not have sex. If you teach them about contreception its basically telling them that having sex is okay and that just makes the problem worse. Study it out.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Kelsey
    Kelsey says:
    March 3, 2013 at 12:52 pm

    The troll is strong with this one! I especially love how you've incorporated Hitler into your screenname so you don't have to waste time violating Godwin's Law separately for each post. 10/10.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Pro Life Pagans
    Pro Life Pagans says:
    March 4, 2013 at 7:01 am

    remove the period after the "S"!

    Log in to Reply
  5. JoAnna Wahlund
    JoAnna Wahlund says:
    March 5, 2013 at 8:54 pm

    Yes, the New York Times is such a tool of the Catholic Church!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Two pro-life laws enacted in Arkansas Fundraiser success!
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}

Subscribe for Livestream Updates and More

* indicates required

Interests

Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.