Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

AB 775: Forcing CPCs to Recommend Abortion in CA

May 1, 2015/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by LN
On Tuesday, April 28th, California State Assembly Bill 775
passed the State Assembly’s Committee on the Judiciary (vote of 7-3) and is now
on its way to the Appropriations Committee of the State Assembly. AB 775 is
also known as “The Reproductive FACT Act” (Freedom, Accountability,
Comprehensive Care and Transparency),
which just sounds so positive and
unobjectionable, but it should have more accurately been named “The
Reproductive CRAP Act”
(Coerced Recommendations for Abortion Practices) to
reflect its true nature.
According to rhrealitycheck.org, AB 775 requires any clinics which
provide pregnancy-related services, including Crisis Pregnancy Centers, to “inform
patients that California has public programs that
provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family
planning services, prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible women.” 
In
other words, facilities that provide abortion want to require CPCs, by law, to
advertise cheap abortion for them (I’m surprised they aren’t requiring CPC
workers to do a jig and present this information in the form of a song)(oh
right, that’s the next bill).
Opponents point out that the bill’s requirements amount to forced
abortion referrals, which CPCs are protected from under the Hyde/WeldonConscience Protection Amendment.
A lawyer representing the bill’s opposition, Sheldon Hadley, says, “The authors
of AB 775 know the Hyde/Weldon Amendment prohibits abortion referrals and
discrimination or forced abortion referrals, and therefore were careful to
avoid using the word ‘referral’ in the bill. But a rose is still a rose under
any other name.” 
But I suppose it wouldn’t be beyond proponents to feign ignorance
when it comes to the definition of “refer” in order to avoid respecting the Weldon Amendment
protections. We can only hope ignorance isn’t a valid argument in court,
because this bill surely amounts to abortion referrals. Check it:

5)Requires licensed covered facilities to disseminate the following
notice in English and in minority languages pursuant to the federal Voting
Rights Act, that states the following:

“California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost
access to comprehensive family planning services (including all FDA-approved
methods of contraception), prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible
women.  To determine whether you qualify,
contact the county social services office at [insert the telephone number].
“

The patient would then call the given number, and social services would
recommend x, y, and z abortion centers in the area. But yeah, totally not a
referral.
A very similar abortion-referral bill is also on its way to being
approved in Illinois.
It passed the Senate by a 34-19 vote and is now in the General Assembly House. Funny
how 39 years ago, the same state’s Republican Congressman, Henry Hyde,
sponsored the Amendment that this very law is attempting to undermine. Oh how times (read: politicians) change.       

Related Posts

Tags: legislation, LN, sidewalk counselors & crisis pregnancy centers
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/danceformepuppets.jpg?fit=746%2C337&ssl=1 337 746 LN https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png LN2015-05-01 00:23:002021-11-08 12:25:28AB 775: Forcing CPCs to Recommend Abortion in CA
You might also like
Senate vote on Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act expected today
People
Option Ultrasound celebrates milestone
508 babies saved in 40 Days campaign
Grandfathers
Supporting women with unplanned pregnancies: can we find common ground with the pro-choice side?
7 things pro-lifers wish our pro-choice friends understood about us.
Three takeaways from NIFLA v. Becerra
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

As the national conversation on abortion intensifies, it’s more important than ever that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Please donate today.

DONATE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Today is Denim Day Show me a sign!
Scroll to top