Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Radical Islam and Sex-Selective Abortion

February 24, 2014/10 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

[Today’s guest post by Roger McCormack is part of our paid blogging program.]

I wrote recently on this blog regarding the connection between religious chauvinism and

sex-selective abortion, using reactionary Hinduism as an example. Sadly, this phenomenon extends to the

Muslim world as well. Extremist Islamic subcultures devalue women, and sometimes this devaluation is accomplished under the guise of policies that would ostensibly appear benign to a Western feminist.

This phenomenon is illustrated well in Great Britain, which has both significant immigration and few abortion restrictions. National Review reports:

Though a government investigation in 2013 determined that girls were not being targeted for

abortions, the Independent‘s investigation found that some ethnic communities in Britain did not have

the natural balance between males and females, and that the abortion of somewhere between 1,400

and 4,700 female fetuses best accounts for that imbalance.

The Independent reviewed the census statistics — particularly statistics of immigrant families, such

as those from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan — finding that in two-child families, having a girl

as the first child significantly increased the chances of having a male as the second child. When these

immigrant couples already have a daughter as their first child, in other words, they sometimes abort

girls to ensure the second will be a boy.

This feeds into the chauvinistic and deeply misogynistic views held by adherents of radical Islam,

views that create a degrading environment in which women struggle to survive, let alone thrive. Criticism of this is often

blunted due to fears of being deemed a racist or Islamaphobe. The latter term, while

accurately applied to those who indiscriminately foment hate against peaceful Muslim groups, is unfortunately also used to quell legitimate criticism of undesirable aspects of a religion, even when those aspects produce deplorable outcomes.

In his book “Why I am Not a Muslim” (which is a play on Bertrand Russell’s famous “Why I

Am Not a Christian”), Pakistani atheist Ibn Warraq says the following:

Indeed a large part of the blame lies with the attitudes inculcated by Islam,

which has always seen woman as inferior to man. The birth of a baby

girl is the occasion for mourning. Hundreds of baby girls are abandoned every

year in the gutters and dust bins and on the pavements. An organization working

in Karachi to save these children has calculated that more than five hundred

children are abandoned a year in Karachi alone, and that 99 percent of them

are girls.

Sex-selection abortions in the West, the Muslim world, and elsewhere of course take place for a multiplicity

of reasons. But we discount the enormous clout of patriarchal norms, and their success in

generating hatred towards females, at our own peril. These questions should be debated

forthrightly, without the obscurantist cliché of pro-lifers being invariably god-fearing. If the previous

examples have showed anything, it is that abortion is far more than merely a hedonistic example of supposedly

decadent Western culture.

Related Posts

Tags: feminism, sex-selective abortion
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2014-02-24 12:29:002021-11-08 12:32:09Radical Islam and Sex-Selective Abortion
You might also like
I Award You No Points.
Abortion Ruins Feminism
7 things pro-lifers wish our pro-choice friends understood about us.
Screening of “Pro-Life Feminist” This Thursday in NYC
Andrew Cuomo and abortion: it’s about power, not equality.
Important news from across the pond
Feminism and Abortion
How abortion is like anti-rape nail polish
10 replies
  1. Jameson Graber
    Jameson Graber says:
    February 24, 2014 at 12:58 pm

    I'm not sure whether I consider this piece inflammatory or not. Words like "radical" and "extreme" are used to tell the reader, "OK, I'm not talking about the good Muslims!" all the while trying to make a link a between the *religion* and a particular bad behavior. I emphasize the word *religion* here, because I think it's interesting to contrast the phrase "some ethic communities" from the cited news article with the the word "religion." While communities can be identified by lots of different traits, a religion is typically identified by beliefs and rituals. Thus there is a rift between the two concepts: on the one hand, a religion may be the common identification of people of many different cultures and communities, and on the other hand, those who identify with a certain religion may not actually hold all of the beliefs generally associated with that religion.

    In particular, I'm pretty sure Islam is generally against abortion, so the idea that Muslims would abort because of radical Islam's patriarchal values is a bit problematic. (On the other hand, some might find the ban on abortion itself patriarchal and mysoginist. But then SPL is in the same boat, no?) So while it's certainly a concern that certain groups may (or may not) be doing sex-selective abortions, linking the practice to a religion, in particular, seems a bit contrary to productive dialog.

    The point about fear of being criticized as "Islamophobe," while it may have some vague truth to it sometimes, but there's really no concrete evidence and so it's not a solid claim. And you're opening a huge can of worms by adding a quote from Ibn Warraq. People make the same claims about Western Christianity. Why attack Islam? I'm tempted to ask of SPL what axe you have to grind with Muslims.

    Overall, I'm confused by this piece, and I find it rather atypical on the SPL blog.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Kelsey
    Kelsey says:
    February 24, 2014 at 3:04 pm

    You're correct that Islam is generally against abortion, but much like Christianity, there's a wide range of interpretations. In particular, there is some Islamic scholarship that supports abortion in the early stages of pregnancy. That doesn't mean that all Muslims adhere to that, of course. There are moderate Muslims, Muslims who are consistently pro-life (including SPL members), and there are radical Muslims who condone, or at the very least tolerate and perpetuate, sex-selective abortion. It's hard to make generalizations about a religion that includes hundreds of millions of people of various ethnic backgrounds.

    I think the usefulness of talking about *radical* Islam comes from the fact that it is an overarching value system that has found support in numerous communities that are otherwise ethnically and culturally distinct. In other words, we aren't talking about a cultural tradition rooted in a particular time and place. We're talking about an ideology that has spread beyond that.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Jameson Graber
    Jameson Graber says:
    February 24, 2014 at 3:19 pm

    Pardon me, but this blog post cites only *one* study (from a biased source) of "some communities" in Britain, a country with liberal abortion laws. This (with a quote thrown in from an atheist writing against Islam) is hardly grounds for talking seriously about an "overarching value system that has found support in numerous communities that are otherwise ethnically and culturally distinct." It is strange to talk about abortion practice in the "Muslim world" without talking about abortion taking place in a Muslim country!

    Don't get me wrong. I'm not denying there are serious problems of gender roles in the Muslim world. I just don't think this post actually addresses any of them.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Jay Smith
    Jay Smith says:
    February 24, 2014 at 4:29 pm

    All reactionary men, regardless of their faith, devalue women. It's not like you can give Christianity a pass, even though you did.

    Log in to Reply
  5. The Nun
    The Nun says:
    February 25, 2014 at 1:44 am

    Don't personally feel devalued. In fact I find my Church has a high regard for women. But you have to read the Church documents not the msm's "journalistic" opinion.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Jay Smith
    Jay Smith says:
    February 25, 2014 at 3:23 am

    You have missed that Bible thing, and 10,000 or so years of human history?

    Log in to Reply
  7. The Nun
    The Nun says:
    February 25, 2014 at 4:15 am

    Ester, Judith, Deborah, Mary… were honoured in the bible.

    The are many matriarchal cultures throughout history. From ancient Egypt to different NA Indian tribes.

    My Church has honoured hundreds of women by elevating them to sainthood. You can even read the patristics to learn how women were essential to the infant Christian Church 2000 years ago.

    The msm tends to ignore this.

    However SPL is really not the place for this discussion so I will stop now.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Mirable
    Mirable says:
    February 26, 2014 at 1:35 am

    Then why is there no female pope? Or Bishops? If women are equal?

    Log in to Reply
  9. The Nun
    The Nun says:
    February 26, 2014 at 4:23 am

    Mirable,

    Why would I want to be a pope or a bishop when I can be a Mother?

    Log in to Reply
  10. Mirable
    Mirable says:
    February 26, 2014 at 4:26 am

    My question still stands.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

The Secular Pro-Life Position – Stanford University Presentation Intrinsic vs. Instrumental Value
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.