Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Are conservative pro-lifers trying to redefine rape?

February 3, 2011/5 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

UPDATE: The language has already been changed.

ORIGINAL POST: The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, a recent proposal that has not yet been passed, contains the usual exceptions for rape, incest, and the mother’s life. But unlike earlier legislation like the Hyde Amendment, it uses the phrase “forcible rape.” This has concerned pro- and anti-abortion feminists alike. All Our Lives writes:

Because neither the bill nor the Federal criminal code defines “forcible” rape, it is impossible to be sure of what this means. Does it include date rape? Rape in which the victim was drugged to the point of being unable to consent? Rape in which the victim was asleep or unconscious? Rape in which the victim was threatened with force, even if that force was not ultimately used? Rape in which the victim was mentally impaired and could not consent?

All of these situations are rape. Women who have had these crimes committed against them, whether or not they become pregnant, are harmed if we as a society deem their experiences to be something less than “real” rape.

As a law student, my initial thought is that this is a case of bad drafting. Somebody thought “We should put a negative adjective before ‘rape,’ to show that we think rape is really bad”– and wound up communicating exactly the opposite. If I’m right, we can expect the word “forcible” to disappear in the wake of bad p.r., with no actual effect on how the law operates. Slipping someone a date rape drug is a use of force, as is threatening someone at knifepoint or imposing sex on a mentally disabled woman.

Nevertheless, feminists are right to demand clarification. The uncertainty of the language is itself damaging. Abortion advocates are using this to malign us all. Now is the moment for pro-life women to stand up.

Related Posts

Tags: feminism
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2011-02-03 13:47:002021-11-08 12:56:51Are conservative pro-lifers trying to redefine rape?
You might also like
Control and Misogyny
Pro-Lifers Attend the Women’s March San Francisco
Annie’s story: unintended pregnancy threatened her athletic scholarship — and her pro-choice views
China to move to 2-child policy by 2015
March for Life announces 2020 theme
Bunnies and Misogyny
Misogyny in pro-life states? Study suggests otherwise.
Women Veterans Bill of Rights
5 replies
  1. Michelle Zhang
    Michelle Zhang says:
    February 3, 2011 at 2:28 pm

    From what I'm reading the term is apparently used at times to distinguish between stat rape and other rapes. Why they need to distinguish I don't know. Is stat rape treated differently under the law?

    Log in to Reply
  2. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    February 3, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    Not sure, Michelle, but it's moot now– see update.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Michelle Zhang
    Michelle Zhang says:
    February 3, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    I still think its a question worth addressing. For future reference. Because if what I said is true then some people deserve an apology from the people who dragged their names in to the dirt.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    February 6, 2011 at 9:11 pm

    Even with "forcible" still in there, it wouldn't redefine rape; it would merely say not all rape gets taxpayer-funded abortions.

    Log in to Reply
  5. 156
    156 says:
    September 21, 2012 at 2:40 am

    Congratulations on beating the mainstream to this problem.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

As the national conversation on abortion intensifies, it’s more important than ever that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Please donate today.

DONATE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Midweek News Roundup: 02/02/11 Time to defund Planned Parenthood
Scroll to top