Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Fetal Pain & Arizona

August 3, 2012/6 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

I have no perspective on the subject of fetal pain because I’ve never looked into it myself.  I’ve never looked into it because fetal pain does not affect my position on abortion.  Even if we were certain fetuses felt no pain during abortion, I would still find abortion unethical and would seek to see it legally restricted.  There are, after all, already-born humans with congenital insensitivity to pain; it is still unethical to kill them.  (Plus, frankly, I’m still a bit researched-out after exploring the alleged abortion-breast cancer link.)

However, the idea of fetal pain does affect policy.  Arizona has created a ban on most abortions beginning at 20-weeks gestation under the theory that this is when the fetus begins to feel pain.  Just this week US District Judge James Tellborg upheld the ban only to have it temporarily prohibited by a federal appeals court days later.  Banning abortion at 20 weeks gestation is a relatively new approach, starting with Nebraska’s ban in 2010.  Arizona is now one of 10 states to attempt this type of legislation.

I’m interested to hear more about the rationale for these bans.  If it is legal to kill a fetus after 20-weeks gestation unless the fetus can feel pain, could doctors simply anesthetize the fetus and then continue?  Or is the ability to feel pain meant to imply that the fetus is now a “person”?  

I know this subject tends to revolve around whether the fetus can feel pain at a certain point, but I’m still stuck on “Why does that matter?”  Why would a human’s inability to feel pain imply less moral worth or legal consideration?

Related Posts

Tags: fetal pain, personhood
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/abortioninstruments.jpg?fit=320%2C312&ssl=1 312 320 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2012-08-03 12:05:002021-11-08 12:41:10Fetal Pain & Arizona
You might also like
Fetal pain bill (LB 1103) passes
Three keys to fetal pain – Part 1: The Definition
What is Wrong With Abortion? A Philosophical Case
Arguments Against Fetal Personhood
Abortion and a Flawed Brain-Life Theory
A Future of Value
Why did people laugh during Roe v Wade?
I Award You No Points.
6 replies
  1. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    August 3, 2012 at 12:31 pm

    I don't think that the ability to feel pain has anything to do with moral worth– and I'm sure the proponents of fetal pain legislation agree. As I see it, killing is wrong, and causing someone physical pain is also wrong. Late-term abortions are worse simply because they do both, not because the child is "worth more." It's analogous to animal rights groups that push for humane slaughter laws; they don't think that slaughter is okay to begin with, but ending suffering is a first step. It gets people thinking in a way that's favorable to greater rights for animals, or the preborn, in the future.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Christina
    Christina says:
    August 3, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    I think most of the point of the law is to get abortion advocates to admit that the abortions even HAPPEN, and to admit that all this time they've been torturing babies to death in-utero. The effect is largely PR, but favorable to PL and unfavorable to PC.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:
    August 3, 2012 at 2:33 pm

    people who support the right to choose aren't in denial about the fact that late term abortions happen. Pro-choice policies are intended to help minimize the chance that a woman seeking an abortion would be at that stage of pregnancy when she gets the abortion. Defunding clinics, legislated waiting periods, and crisis pregnancy centers work to undermine women seeking an abortion, which means that by the time they are able to get access to a legitmate abortion provider, the chance of complications are higher. In countries where there is easy access to reproductive health services, the abortion rate and the rate of late term abortions is lower. Pro-life policies are the cause of abortion related hazards.

    Log in to Reply
    • Sarah Cane
      Sarah Cane says:
      August 3, 2012 at 4:30 pm

      Sure, pro-lifers are the cause of late term abortions, not the people seeking the abortions or the doctors performing them.

      Keep telling yourself that to try to absolve yourself of the guilt and sorrow that you must be feeling deep inside.

      Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:
    August 3, 2012 at 5:17 pm

    While both sides prattle on and argue, everyone is loosing site of the real victims and the gross human rights issue we are facing.

    While we are all arguing and debating, living children that feel very real pain are being dismembered and ripped from their mothers womb. They are being ripped apart, while alive, piece by piece. Just think about it for a moment. Forget all the rhetoric.

    If you need a visual image, see a medical diagram of the procedure at:

    http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/DEabortiongraphic.html

    Imagine, for a minute, the immense pain that they must be feeling.

    This goes beyond politics, religion, etc. This is huge injustice and is just plain wrong and horrific, no matter what side of the 'aisle' you sit on.

    Log in to Reply
  5. KB
    KB says:
    August 3, 2012 at 6:04 pm

    I agree, pain is irrelevant to the question. Certainly, causing more pain would in my opinion is wrong as well, but it is not required to answer the question: is it okay to destroy human life?

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Medication Abortion
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

As the national conversation on abortion intensifies, it’s more important than ever that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Please donate today.

DONATE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Abandoned: The Untold Story of the Abortion Wars IVF and Motivations
Scroll to top