Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Posts

Society of Family Planning: how to induce fetal asystole (baby heart attack)

October 23, 2024/in Later Abortion, Research, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

[This article is a transcript of “Why do abortion providers need to ‘induce fetal asystole’?” courtesy of volunteer Ben Tomlin. If you’re interested in volunteering to transcribe more of our content, please complete our volunteer survey.] (Video is also available on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube) Have you ever had a pro-choice person tell you that there’s […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/diana-polekhina-BUfaFc4L8V0-unsplash.jpg?fit=1920%2C1188&ssl=1 1188 1920 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-10-23 04:33:002024-10-22 18:23:00Society of Family Planning: how to induce fetal asystole (baby heart attack)

Pro-abortion lexicon: don’t say “heartbeat” or “living”

October 7, 2024/in Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

[This article is a transcript of “Pro-abortion lexicon: don’t say ‘living’” courtesy of volunteer Ben Tomlin. If you’re interested in volunteering to transcribe more of our content, please complete our volunteer survey.] Okay, are you ready for this mouthful: “A Lexicon for First-Trimester Ultrasounds: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations.” They’re trying to […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/kristina-flour-BcjdbyKWquw-unsplash-scaled.jpg?fit=2560%2C1638&ssl=1 1638 2560 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-10-07 04:13:002025-01-19 19:05:08Pro-abortion lexicon: don’t say “heartbeat” or “living”

No, Texas maternal mortality didn’t “skyrocket” after heartbeat law

September 25, 2024/in Legislation, laws, & court cases, Research, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

Under the “abortion rights” section of NBC’s website, they have “A dramatic rise in pregnant women dying in Texas after abortion ban.” The article is a summary of an unpublished analysis from the Gender Equity Policy Insitute (GEPI). I searched their website and couldn’t find any recent reports related to Texas. I can’t look at […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/pregnancy-related-covid-excluded-maternal-deaths-comparison.png?fit=1363%2C939&ssl=1 939 1363 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-09-25 14:40:232025-01-19 19:02:07No, Texas maternal mortality didn’t “skyrocket” after heartbeat law

Summary: Disobedience, Medicine, and the Rule of Law

September 11, 2024/in Uncategorized /by Leslie Corbly

In a Harvard Law Review journal article, Mary Ziegler raises important questions about the status of pro-choice and pro-life conscientious objectors operating in the field of medicine. For example, in a post-Roe context, pro-choice medical providers face conflicting pressures from licensing boards and legal codes. Pro-life medical providers face unfriendly regulators who view abortion as […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/stethescope.jpg?fit=255%2C255&ssl=1 255 255 Leslie Corbly https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Leslie Corbly2024-09-11 03:56:002024-09-19 12:35:02Summary: Disobedience, Medicine, and the Rule of Law

How doctors can build trust with parents of children with Trisomy 13 or 18

August 26, 2024/in Ableism, Research, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

I recently read this article in the journal Palliative Medicine: Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18. Trisomy 13 and 18 are common life-limiting conditions associated with major disabilities. This article explores the experiences of parents of children with Trisomy 13 or 18, focusing on the parents’ interactions […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Building-trust-and-improving-communication-with-parents-of-children-with-trisomy-13-and-18-summary.png?fit=1080%2C1080&ssl=1 1080 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-08-26 04:11:002024-09-19 12:34:26How doctors can build trust with parents of children with Trisomy 13 or 18

Describing miscarriage as “intrauterine death” threatens abortion rights

July 26, 2024/in Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

In 2023, Jessalyn Bohn wrote “When Words Fail: ‘Miscarriage,’ Referential Ambiguity, and Psychological Harm.” She called for more precision and sensitivity when describing pregnancy loss. About a year later, Belinda Alievska wrote some reflections of Bohn’s work: The Implications of Revising The Terminology of Pregnancy Loss. Specifically Alievska worried that Bohn’s proposed phrase “intrauterine death” […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/dominoes.png?fit=1080%2C1080&ssl=1 1080 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-07-26 04:30:002024-09-16 09:50:29Describing miscarriage as “intrauterine death” threatens abortion rights

Testing biological tissue for abortion drugs

July 12, 2024/in Abortion pills, Biology, Research, Uncategorized /by Petra Wallenmeyer

Photo Credit Chromatograph on Unsplash Two studies explain proof of concept for testing for the presence of abortion drugs after a pregnancy loss using a highly specific process: ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (QqQ-MS/MS) (coupled as UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS). Here, I will walk through what exactly this testing process is and how […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/chromatograph-_whop2XD0Mk-unsplash.jpg?fit=1920%2C1279&ssl=1 1279 1920 Petra Wallenmeyer https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Petra Wallenmeyer2024-07-12 01:32:002024-09-19 12:35:27Testing biological tissue for abortion drugs

Did Texas’ Heartbeat Law increase infant mortality rates?

June 27, 2024/in Ableism, Later Abortion, Legislation, laws, & court cases, Research, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

A transcription of the video, with source links and post-video notes, follows. A new study purports to show an increase in infant mortality in Texas due to their Heartbeat Bill: their September 2021, approximately six week abortion ban. Specifically, the study found an excess of 216 infant deaths, or a 12.7% increase over what they […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/texas-infant-mortality-rate-Cover.jpg?fit=1080%2C1920&ssl=1 1920 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-06-27 03:30:002025-01-19 19:02:07Did Texas’ Heartbeat Law increase infant mortality rates?

Did Dobbs make any difference? Guttmacher reports over 1M abortions in 2023

March 21, 2024/in Legislation, laws, & court cases, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

[Most of this info is also available as a Twitter/X thread here.] A new Guttmacher report shows abortions in 2023 are at the highest level since 2012. At an estimated 1,026,690 abortions, the 2023 number is a 10% increase over 2020 levels. Does this mean Dobbs (the 2022 Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/abortion-restrictions-increase-birth-rates.png?fit=1080%2C1080&ssl=1 1080 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-03-21 05:46:002025-01-19 19:02:07Did Dobbs make any difference? Guttmacher reports over 1M abortions in 2023

No, Dobbs hasn’t caused “sweeping changes” in where doctors practice medicine

March 15, 2024/in Legislation, laws, & court cases, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

The Chronicle for Higher Education recently published “Medical Students Fought to Get Training in Abortion Care. Then Came ‘Dobbs.’” Author Heidi Landecker paints a grim picture of medical students who just want to practice “ethical medicine” (perform abortions), but struggle to get training in states that have been able to restrict elective abortion since Dobbs. […]

Read more
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/dobbs-isnt-causing-sweeping-changes.png?fit=1080%2C1080&ssl=1 1080 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-03-15 05:28:002025-01-19 19:02:07No, Dobbs hasn’t caused “sweeping changes” in where doctors practice medicine
Page 1 of 212

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Scroll to top
Want to join our mailing list?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.