Secular Pro-Life
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Content
    • Abortion Debate Index
    • Blog
      • Biology
      • Debunking
      • Dialogue strategy
      • Later Abortion
      • Legislation, Laws & Court Cases
      • Miscarriage
      • Religion
      • We Asked You Answered
      • Your Stories
    • Training
      • How to Tell Your Story
      • 3 reasons you should let people know you’re pro-life
      • Emotional regulation during in-person abortion discussions
      • Making online abortion debates worthwhile
      • Comprehensive “Building Bridges” Training
      • More Dialogue Strategies
    • Research
      • What counts as an “abortion”?
      • The Turnaway Study’s Overlooked Findings
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Abortion Law and Infant Mortality
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Videos
      • Debunking
      • Deep Dive Discussions
      • Livestream Replays
    • Image Galleries
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Prenatal Diagnoses
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas (e-book)
      • Overview of SPL (brochure)
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (brochure)
      • 3 reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (flyer)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (brochure)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (flyer)
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum (e-book)
      • Fetal Remains Disposition Protocol
      • FAQ (flyer)
      • Presentations overview (card)
    • Presentations
      • Bridges Intensive
      • Building Bridges
      • Secular Post-Abortion Healing
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Don’t Feed The Trolls
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
    • Store
  • Contact
    • General Inquiries
    • Media Inquiries
    • Book a Speaker
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • SPL Supporter Survey
      • Abortion Debate
        • Which scenarios are abortions?
        • Who Counts as Anti-Abortion?
        • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • Your Experiences
        • Why are you pro-life?
        • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
        • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
        • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
        • Parents’ experiences with prenatal screening
        • Your experiences with adoption
        • Your experiences with processing abortion
        • Pro-Life Medical Professionals survey
      • Why do you support SPL?
  • Speakers
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Monica Snyder

Are you a hypocrite? Taking different positions on abortion and the death penalty.

October 7, 2026/in Dialogue strategy, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

Note: Secular Pro-Life does not take a position on the death penalty because we are a single issue group. We invite people both for and against the death penalty to work with us to oppose abortion.

We should be able to accurately describe our opposition’s perspective.

It’s usually not hypocritical to oppose abortion while supporting the death penalty, or vice versa, because those positions can follow logically from different premises. People who call these positions hypocritical typically assume premises their opponents don’t hold.

[Quick video – Could you pass an ideological turing test?]

Few people oppose literally all forms of killing. For example, it’s very common to think killing in self-defense is justified. When it comes to abortion and the death penalty, what premises might make opposing one while supporting the other a consistent position?

Position 1: Opposing abortion and supporting the death penalty.

People who oppose abortion usually hold the premise that abortion takes the life of an innocent person, specifically a child or baby.

People who support the death penalty usually hold the premise that the death penalty ends the life of a person guilty of a heinous crime, typically an adult.

If someone thinks killing innocent people is wrong but killing people guilty of heinous crimes may be justified, or if they think killing children or babies is wrong but killing adults may be justified, these views of abortion and the death penalty aren’t incompatible.

[Read more – “Oh, so are you against the death penalty?”]

Position 2: Supporting abortion and opposing the death penalty.

People who support abortion usually hold one or both of the following premises:

  1. Abortion is preventing a person from coming into existence, not ending the life of a person who already exists. (See the Personhood section of our Abortion Debate Index)
  2. No one has the right to use another’s body against their will, and stopping someone from doing so is a matter of self-defense. (See the Bodily Rights section of our Abortion Debate Index)

If someone thinks killing people is wrong but doesn’t view embryos and fetuses as “people,” or if someone thinks killing people is wrong except in matters of bodily defense, these views of abortion and the death penalty aren’t incompatible.

Instead of accusing people of hypocrisy, look for common ground.

If we want to persuade people to reconsider their position, finding common ground and encouraging open dialogue are both more effective than accusing them of hypocrisy. Assigning people bad motivations or character defects usually makes them feel defensive. They’ll want to dig in their heels and argue why their position is sensible or moral. Naming points of agreement makes people feel connected and understood, which tends to make them more open to understanding us.

Sometimes it’s not even a matter of changing our overall points, only our framing. For example both the following argue that people who oppose the death penalty should oppose abortion:

  • Frame 1: If you support abortion, you already support the death penalty, just for babies instead of criminals.
  • Frame 2: Yeah, I think opposing killing people is a good baseline position. That’s the same reason I’m against elective abortion.

Frame 1 is accusatory, and it’s telling someone else what they think or feel or what motivates them (an incredibly unpersuasive tactic). Frame 2 is finding common ground, and then describing what we think or feel or what motivates us.

Accusing are opposition of hypocrisy is usually faster and frankly more cathartic than taking the time and energy to try to understand them accurately. But if we want to add more light than heat – and specifically if we want to change people’s minds – the extra effort is worth it.

Learn how to have useful conversations with pro-choice friends and family. Read more about our trainings and speakers here.


If you appreciate our work and would like to help, one of the most effective ways to do so is to become a monthly donor. You can also give a one-time donation here or volunteer with us here.

Related posts:

  1. “Oh, so are you against the death penalty?”
  2. What Mothers See After Taking Abortion Pills
  3. Describing miscarriage as “intrauterine death” threatens abortion rights
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/death-penalty-abortion-hypocrisy.jpg 720 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2026-10-07 05:05:002026-10-07 07:52:06Are you a hypocrite? Taking different positions on abortion and the death penalty.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Debunking
  • Denial of Care
  • Dialogue strategy
  • Interviews
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, Laws & Court Cases
  • Livestream Recaps
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Reproductive Grief Resources
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

Subscribe to our Substack

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2026 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Podcast recap: “That’s The Personhood Debate” with Let Them Live
Scroll to top
Media Inquiries

Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.

Already subscribed? Click here to hide this.