Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview of SPL
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum
      • FAQ
      • Presentations overview
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Gosnell Updates

August 14, 2012/3 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

The Associated Press reports on developments in the case of Kermit Gosnell, the infamous abortion doctor arrested in January of 2011 and charged with eight counts of murder.  According to the AP:

City prosecutors say the deaths [of a patient and seven babies] were no accident but the result of dangerous medical practices that went on for decades at his filthy Women’s Medical Center.
“The uncharged conduct is relevant and should be admitted. It shows that breaking the law was standard operating procedure,” Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore wrote in a recent motion.
One former employee told a grand jury that she was expected to perform anesthesia on patients after just 15 minutes of training from Gosnell. Before long, she couldn’t sleep at night.
“She knew that if she made even a small error, ‘I can kill this lady, and I’m not jail material,'” Pescatore wrote in the motion, quoting from the woman’s grand jury testimony. “One night in 2002, when she found herself alone with 15 patients, she refused Gosnell’s directives to medicate them. She made an excuse, went to her car, and drove away, never to return.”

 Nine other clinic workers have been charged, and several have plead guilty to third degree murder for their roles in performing late term abortions.  If Gosnell is convicted, he will face the death penalty.

Related Posts

Tags: abortion providers, infanticide
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/handcuffs.jpg?fit=320%2C240&ssl=1 240 320 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2012-08-14 12:02:002021-11-08 12:40:59Gosnell Updates
You might also like
Pro-life and committed to ending abortion: but NOT “by any means necessary”
Another waste disposal company quits working with abortion vendors
Ewwwww!
Birmingham abortion center closes
Well, this ruined my Memorial Day
Blurred lines.
Abortionists’ Legal Woes
Apparently protecting embryos is more extreme than severing babies’ spines.
3 replies
  1. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:
    August 14, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    There have been many calls for further restrictions on abortion, much revulsion expressed at post-viability abortions, much blame cast on prochoicers for supposedly doing nothing to stop him. But it has not been pointed out often enough that what Dr. Gosnell was doing was illegal in Pennsylvania. It is not legal to perform abortions after twenty-four weeks. It is not legal to slit the necks of born-alive fetuses at any age, much less at thirty weeks or even more. It is not legal for untrained, unlicensed employees to perform medical procedures.

    Now prochoicers are being blamed for this rogue operator. The grand jury report suggests that Tom Ridge, Republican governor from 1995 to 2001, discontinued inspections because prochoicers claimed they were too burdensome. The ones I talked to were skeptical. “We never lobbied against inspection,” Carol Tracy of the Women’s Law Project, which represents clinics in Pennsylvania, told me by phone. She pointed out that under Ridge’s Democratic predecessor, Bob Casey, who was famously opposed to legal abortion, Gosnell’s clinic was inspected three times, and each time serious problems were found. Nothing was done. Perhaps it’s relevant that Gosnell’s patients were poor, many of them immigrants—like 41-year-old Karnamaya Mongar from Nepal, with whose murder Gosnell has been charged—who may not even have known that safe and legal abortion is available here.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Dalia Riccard
    Dalia Riccard says:
    August 16, 2012 at 3:35 pm

    The above comment is typical pro-abortion 'Good is Evil and Evil is Good' doublespeak and doublethink.

    Who's fault is the Gosnell Horror? Certainly not Gosnell himself, or the clinic workers who witnessed the atrocities day in and day out, or the state officials who looked the other way.

    It must be the pro-lifers fault. If only woman had access to 'safe' abortion, this would never have happened!

    Or better yet, it must have been the baby's fault for having the audacity to be conceived in the first place.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Daniel Smithes
    Daniel Smithes says:
    August 16, 2012 at 3:44 pm

    For anyone who doesn't have background on the case, the Grand Jury document can be found at:

    http://www.phila.gov/districtattorney/PDFs/GrandJuryWomensMedical.pdf

    Beware, graphic photos of full term, murdered children are shown in the document.

    Also, the first commentator's claim that pro-abortion groups do not lobby against regulations and inspections is a joke. Of course they will say that they don't lobby against regulations.

    Pro-abortion groups nationwide have lobbied hard and have been mostly successful in preventing regulation, licensing and inspection.

    Hair and nail salons are subject to more rigorous inspection than abortion mills.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

People v. Davis Viability = Personhood?
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.