Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

SBA List announces pro-life priorities in Presidential Leadership Pledge

June 18, 2011/4 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

The Susan B. Anthony List has announced that five presidential candidates– Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Tim Pawlenty, and Rick Santorum– have signed on to its Pro-Life Presidential Leadership Pledge. The Pledge lists four priorities:

FIRST, to nominate to the U.S. federal bench judges who are committed to restraint and applying the original meaning of the Constitution, not legislating from the bench;

SECOND, to select only pro-life appointees for relevant Cabinet and Executive Branch positions, in particular the head of National Institutes of Health, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Health & Human Services;

THIRD, to advance pro-life legislation to permanently end all taxpayer funding of abortion in all domestic and international spending programs, and defund Planned Parenthood and all other contractors and recipients of federal funds with affiliates that perform or fund abortions;

FOURTH, advance and sign into law a Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to protect unborn children who are capable of feeling pain from abortion

Three candidates have refused to sign: Gary Johnson (who is campaigning on a pro-choice platform), Mitt Romney (whose refusal caught the notice of Politico), and Herman Cain. Cain is surprising, since he’s been vocally pro-life from the beginning of his campaign. Perhaps he feels that the pro-life movement would be better served with different priorities.

The first and second promises strike me as pretty standard fare for a pro-life president. The promise to defund Planned Parenthood is interesting, but we already know from experience that no president will be able to deliver on it without major changes to the Senate. As to the fourth promise, this is the first indication I’ve seen that the pro-life movement wants to pass a federal Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. Quite a few have passed on the state level, and pro-abortion groups have decided not to challenge them in court; passing one on the federal level could force their hand.

I can also think of plenty of things that can be done on the federal level but are not listed in the Pledge.

Do you share the SBA List’s priorities? If not, what would you strike or add?

Related Posts

Tags: politics
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2011-06-18 11:30:002021-11-08 12:55:29SBA List announces pro-life priorities in Presidential Leadership Pledge
You might also like
The Supreme Court short list
Election Reflection
Pro-lifers in Congress get busy
Tonight: GOP Presidential Hopefuls Debate on CNN
All Eyes on the Race for Governor of Virginia
Lies, Damned Lies, and the Abortion Lobby on Zika
Today’s the Day: Vote Pro-Life Down-Ballot!
Mitch Daniels wants a “truce” on abortion
4 replies
  1. Matthew Newman
    Matthew Newman says:
    June 18, 2011 at 11:51 am

    To me, I can see #4 as the sticking point. Certain sections of the conservative movement oppose federal involvement where state involvement is more appropriate. Cain, for example, is opposed to same-sex marriage – but opposes a federal approach (i.e. a federal marriage amendment) and supports individual states to define it as they see fit. As someone who's been so vocally pro-life, I assume that's the logic behind this decision.

    Mostly because that would be the reason I would not sign such a promise myself.

    Log in to Reply
  2. AngelaG
    AngelaG says:
    June 18, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    Are you opposed to the 13th Amendment, which unequivocally told the States they have no right to determine whether or not to allow slavery? If the unborn are people (which they are), then the individual states do not have a right to determine whether or not to protect them. I'm a libertarian/constitutionalist, but I don't think the decision to allow/forbid lynching people in the streets (or in medical clinics) falls under the 10th Amendment.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Matthew Newman
    Matthew Newman says:
    June 19, 2011 at 11:52 pm

    Here's the specific reasons that Cain and Romney said they would not sign the pledge.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Marysia
    Marysia says:
    June 21, 2011 at 12:17 am

    Waiting & working my butt off for the day when "prolife" means thorough commitment at all levels of society to ensure that women have every possible high-quality choice in contraception, prenatal and child birth care, parenting, adoption, guardianship, and all possible lifelong supports for whatever choices they make about their children.

    When it does not mean posturing and saying words and in effect condemning women through your inaction & undermining of vital social programs to unintended pregnancies & abortions and pretending there's no blood on your own hands…at the same time you're all for warmongering, the death penalty, etc.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Medication Abortion
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

As the national conversation on abortion intensifies, it’s more important than ever that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Please donate today.

DONATE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

One year, one state, thousands of abortion complications Happy Father’s Day
Scroll to top