Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

The story behind the story

September 15, 2010/5 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

Tea partier Christine O’Donnell won the Delaware Republican primary, causing the media to go into a tizzy. Political pundits are speculating wildly about the chances of the tea party movement being a massive political force come November. I’m not going to make any predictions either way. I just want to take a moment to note something that most media reports have neglected to mention: O’Donnell was the only pro-life candidate. Some articles alluded to the difference by calling the incumbent Republican she defeated, Mike Castle, a “moderate.” In fact, he’s not moderate on abortion at all: he received 100% ratings from NARAL in 2005, 2006 and 2007. His dip to 25% approval in 2009 was apparently not sufficient to save his reputation with pro-life voters.

According to the National Right to Life Committee, single-issue pro-life voters routinely have an impact of 3 to 4 percentage points. O’Donnell won by six percent. So while the pro-life vote may not have been dispositive, it definitely helped!

Whether or not we agree with O’Donnell’s “tea party” politics, her victory stands for something broader. It stands for the proposition that, in a close race (and there are many expected in November), no candidate can afford to discard the right to life as an irrelevant “social issue.” *Cough*MitchDaniels*HaleyBarbour*Cough*

Related Posts

Tags: politics, Republicans
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2010-09-15 18:03:002021-11-08 12:58:55The story behind the story
You might also like
Senator Tim Kaine, the “Personally Pro-Life” Politician
Women Veterans Bill of Rights
Todd Akin: Sorry He Was Sorry.
Increased identification with the pro-life label
Donald Trump is a Disaster Waiting to Happen for the Pro-Life Cause
Scatterbrained Sunday: Lessons from this weekend
SBA List announces pro-life priorities in Presidential Leadership Pledge
Elena Kagan to be nominated for Supreme Court
5 replies
  1. Yonmei
    Yonmei says:
    September 21, 2010 at 4:14 pm

    Apparently Tom Ross, the Delaware Republican Party Chairman, said of Christine O'Donnell that she was someone who "could not get elected dogcatcher."

    In the primary O'Donnell won with 30,000 votes. One in six registered Republicans in Delaware voted for her – or about 1 in 20 registered voters.

    Which suggests that Chris Coons, the Democratic candidate, is going to win it in a walk – which would be unlikely if the popular favourite, Mike Castle, hadn't lost to the teaparty candidate in the primaries.

    And Chris Coons has received a 100% pro-choice rating from NARAL.

    So Christine O'Donnell's primary victory is a victory for pro-choice in Delaware. Which is good for anyone not deluded enough to think that "the right to life" only applies to fetuses, and never to women.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    September 21, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    What percentage of registered voters voted for Coons in the primary?

    Log in to Reply
  3. Yonmei
    Yonmei says:
    September 21, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    What percentage of registered voters voted for Coons in the primary?

    He ran unopposed, Nulono. (The primary got a turnout of 12% of Democratic voters, according to the website I found. I'm presuming that if the Democratic candidate runs unopposed, there isn't a primary. But I'm not familiar with your US election system.)

    I do, however, look at common sense. Christine O'Donnell appears likely to appeal to two groups of candidates – the minority who voted for her in the primary, and the minority in Delaware who vote "R" without worrying about candidate. An extremist who gets in to the running because of a low turn out, who has no appeal outside her extremist group, is not a likely winner in any election.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    September 21, 2010 at 9:15 pm

    I'm not doubting that the Tea Party is going to be a boon for liberals in November. I'm just questioning your logic of using the percentage of registered voters voting for a candidate in the primaries to determine success in the general election.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Yonmei
    Yonmei says:
    September 22, 2010 at 7:34 am

    Oh. I thought you were sulking and arguing pointlessly because you're cross that the pro-life candidate won't get in.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Medication Abortion
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

As the national conversation on abortion intensifies, it’s more important than ever that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Please donate today.

DONATE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Assorted news Quick News Roundup: 09/16/10
Scroll to top