Secular Pro-Life
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
      • Biology
      • Debunking
      • Dialogue strategy
      • Later Abortion
      • Legislation, laws, & court cases
      • Miscarriage
      • Religion
      • We Asked You Answered
      • Your Stories
    • Research
      • What counts as an “abortion”?
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Videos
      • Debunking
      • Deep Dive Discussions
      • Livestream Replays
    • Collections
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Prenatal Diagnoses
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas (e-book)
      • Overview of SPL (brochure)
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (brochure)
      • 3 reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (flyer)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (brochure)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (flyer)
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum (e-book)
      • Fetal Remains Disposition Protocol
      • FAQ (flyer)
      • Presentations overview (card)
    • Presentations
      • Bridges Intensive
      • Building Bridges
      • Secular Post-Abortion Healing
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Don’t Feed The Trolls
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
    • Store
  • Contact
    • General Inquiries
    • Media Inquiries
    • Book a Speaker
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
      • Your experiences with processing abortion
      • Pro-Life Medical Professionals survey
  • Speakers
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Las leyes que regulan el aborto reducen internacionalmente las tasas de aborto, pero altas tasas de embarazo no deseado pueden ocultar este efecto.

February 1, 2023/0 Comments/in en español, Legislation, laws, & court cases, Research /by Guest Blogger

[This article is a Spanish translation of “Abortion laws decrease abortion rates internationally, but high unintended pregnancy rates can mask this effect” courtesy of volunteer Pablo Caballero. If you’re interested in volunteering to translate our content, please fill out our volunteer survey.] [Una versión de esta publicación está disponible en Twitter aquí .] En septiembre de 2020, […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/kyle-glenn-nXt5HtLmlgE-unsplash-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Guest Blogger https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Guest Blogger2023-02-01 12:56:092023-02-14 15:09:07Las leyes que regulan el aborto reducen internacionalmente las tasas de aborto, pero altas tasas de embarazo no deseado pueden ocultar este efecto.

What one pro-choice researcher got wrong — and right — about PRCs

January 9, 2023/0 Comments/in Research, Uncategorized /by Virginia Pride

With past and present attacks on pregnancy resource centers (PRCs), both political and physical, it is natural for pro-life advocates to become frustrated with critiques on one of our most valuable resources. There are several branches of PRCs, some secular (such as Birthright International) and others religiously affiliated (such as Heartbeat International). Still others are […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/alex-motoc-OEMP9bA6mDo-unsplash-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Virginia Pride https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Virginia Pride2023-01-09 03:41:002023-04-11 10:20:01What one pro-choice researcher got wrong — and right — about PRCs

Coerced Abortion Exists — And Can Cause Rapid Repeat Pregnancy

December 19, 2022/0 Comments/in Research, Uncategorized /by Virginia Pride

#ShoutYourAbortion, and other positive abortion mantras, have taken over the post-Roe conversation in retaliation to abortion restrictions. There comes with it a denial or silence of traumatic abortion experiences. The APA will typically focus on the (short term) trauma of wanted abortions that were denied, rather than the long term trauma of forcibly receiving one. […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/alexander-grey-uS5lTkVwSb0-unsplash-scaled.jpg 1707 2560 Virginia Pride https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Virginia Pride2022-12-19 05:00:002026-03-24 11:24:14Coerced Abortion Exists — And Can Cause Rapid Repeat Pregnancy

Three keys to fetal pain – Part 1: The Definition

December 7, 2022/0 Comments/in Biology, Research, Uncategorized /by John Bockmann

The way I see it, there are three keys to fetal pain: Today I’ll discuss the first key: the International Association of the Study of Pain (IASP)’s revised definition of pain, which has profound implications for how we conceptualize fetal pain. Why does the definition matter? It may seem strange that I begin with a […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/fetal-pain-Myron-Yaster.png 1080 1080 John Bockmann https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png John Bockmann2022-12-07 04:50:002022-12-06 19:25:00Three keys to fetal pain – Part 1: The Definition

Do Pro-Life Laws Endanger Women’s Lives?

December 2, 2022/0 Comments/in Legislation, laws, & court cases, Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss, Research /by Daniel Gump

By Daniel Gump (This article originally appeared on The Pro-Life Review.) It is often claimed by abortion proponents that induced abortions are “coded” the same as many other medical procedures. They also claim that physicians and pharmacists have withheld emergency treatments from patients to avoid any legal gray areas in states where induced abortions are […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/pro-life-feminist-dark-hair.jpg 683 1024 Daniel Gump https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Daniel Gump2022-12-02 04:34:002022-12-01 20:20:06Do Pro-Life Laws Endanger Women’s Lives?

Roe’s Unsung Toll

November 28, 2022/0 Comments/in Research, Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recently released its annual abortion surveillance report. The headline is that abortions declined in 2020, and that is probably true. But keep in mind that the CDC’s reports have significant limitations, the biggest one being that a few pro-abortion states (notably California) refuse to cooperate in data collection. The […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/rhodi-lopez-Cxpqnzd3Psg-unsplash.jpg 1258 2560 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2022-11-28 05:05:002022-11-28 06:15:25Roe’s Unsung Toll

Cinco años después, 96% de las mujeres a las que fue negado el aborto ya no querrían haberlo tenido. (Estudio del Rechazo)

November 15, 2022/0 Comments/in Adoption & Foster Care, en español, Research /by Guest Blogger

[This article is a Spanish translation of Five years later, 96% of women denied abortion no longer wish they could have had one. (Turnaway Study) courtesy of volunteer Pablo Mestrovic. If you’re interested in volunteering to translate our content, please fill out our volunteer survey.] El Estudio del Rechazo tuvo una estadística muy promocionada acerca de cómo […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2021-03-07_082424.jpg 400 298 Guest Blogger https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Guest Blogger2022-11-15 17:07:002023-12-30 15:32:59Cinco años después, 96% de las mujeres a las que fue negado el aborto ya no querrían haberlo tenido. (Estudio del Rechazo)

The American Public Wants Abortion Limits

November 7, 2022/0 Comments/in Later Abortion, Legislation, laws, & court cases, Pro-Life Demographics, Research, Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

Secular Pro-Life supporter Benjamin K. asks: “I’m having some pushback on my public claims that the majority of pro-choice people support at least some restrictions. Am I misinterpreting polls that say the majority of Americans support at least some restrictions?” Great question, Ben! You are correct, and the polling is very consistent. Limitless abortion has […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/272394775_304006988423103_296599881870482045_n.jpg 1365 2048 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2022-11-07 05:35:242022-11-07 05:35:25The American Public Wants Abortion Limits

The Risks of Telemedicine Abortion

November 2, 2022/0 Comments/in Abortion pills, Research, Uncategorized /by Audrey Wagner

Telemedicine abortion—often by phone—is on the rise  During the COVID-19 pandemic, a minority of counties allowed abortion providers to send abortion pills (usually mifepristone and misoprostol) to women by mail after a remote video or phone consultation, with no in-person contact throughout the process, Calum Miller points out in Chapter 16 of Agency, Pregnancy, and […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/image.jpeg 750 500 Audrey Wagner https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Audrey Wagner2022-11-02 05:47:002026-02-11 19:38:05The Risks of Telemedicine Abortion

Abortion Does Not Make More Children “Wanted”

October 28, 2022/0 Comments/in Research, Uncategorized /by Sarah Terzo

When pro-abortion advocates were first trying to legalize abortion in the early 1970s, one common argument was that legalizing abortion would prevent child abuse. The argument was that women who wanted abortions but weren’t able to have them were more likely to abuse their children. Lawrence Lader, co-founder of the pro-abortion group NARAL predicted that […]

Read more
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/annie-spratt-gq5PECP8pHE-unsplash-scaled.jpg 1704 2560 Sarah Terzo https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Sarah Terzo2022-10-28 04:29:002022-10-27 09:08:37Abortion Does Not Make More Children “Wanted”
Page 6 of 12«‹45678›»

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Debunking
  • Denial of Care
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Livestream Recaps
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

Subscribe to our Substack

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2026 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail

Scroll to top
Media Inquiries

Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.

Already subscribed? Click here to hide this.