Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Presentations
    • Bridges Intensive
    • Building Bridges
    • Secular Post-Abortion Healing
    • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
    • Don’t Feed The Trolls
    • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • A Secular Case Against Abortion
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
      • Biology
      • Debunking
      • Dialogue strategy
      • Later Abortion
      • Legislation, laws, & court cases
      • Religion
      • We Asked You Answered
      • Your Stories
    • Research
      • What counts as an “abortion”?
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas (e-book)
      • Overview of SPL (brochure)
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (brochure)
      • 3 reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (flyer)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (brochure)
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum (e-book)
      • Fetal Remains Disposition Protocol
      • FAQ (flyer)
      • Presentations overview (card)
    • Store
  • Contact
    • General Inquiries
    • Book a Speaker
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
      • Your experiences with processing abortion
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Kelsey Hazzard

Progress in the battle on rapist parental rights

April 5, 2016/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard
Graphic via RAINN

Two years ago, we wrote:

In 31 states, a rapist can sue to obtain custody or visitation rights for the child conceived by his violence against the mother. 

I have to believe that these laws are simply the result of oversight. Perhaps these laws were written decades ago, when rape was a taboo topic and DNA testing was unknown, and legislators at the time simply didn’t think to write in any particular provisions concerning rapists. As a result, rapists have the same rights as any other biological fathers. Once legislation is enacted, political inertia comes into play, and no reform comes until people start making real noise.

The time to make that noise is now. If there is any common ground between pro-lifers and pro-choicers, this is it! These outdated policies encourage abortion, threaten women’s safety and sanity, expose children to needless instability and stress, and are just plain outrageous.

In some states, a rapist only loses custody if convicted of criminal charges, which requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Rape is notoriously difficult to prosecute; by some estimates, only 5% of rapists are convicted. But in typical child custody matters that don’t involve rape, the applicable standard for a parent’s fitness to be involved in the child’s life is “clear and convincing” proof, which is less stringent than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Hope After Rape Conception—an organization co-founded by pro-life advocate Rebecca Kiessling, who was conceived in rape—works diligently to reform state laws on rapist custody, promoting model legislation to bring rape custody cases under the clear and convincing standard. They caught a break last year, when federal legislation passed that gives states financial incentives to enact reform. The latest state to consider reform is Hawaii:

Rape is one of the most under-prosecuted crimes, with less than 5 percent of rapes leading to convictions, according to the Hawaii Attorney General’s Office. The department says rapists may use the threat of pursuing custody to coerce survivors from pressing charges. …

The Hawaii bill was introduced as part of Gov. David Ige’s legislative package for the 2016 session in response to federal law passed last year. The Rape Survivor Child Custody Act of 2015 increases funding for states that that allow for termination of parental rights for sexual assault based on the “clear and convincing” standard.

Julie Ebato of the Hawaii Attorney General’s Office said the state could get over $127,000 in additional funding. The department hasn’t figured out how it would use the money yet, but it could be used help victims by providing money for police, prosecutors and service providers.

For instance, Ebato said the money could help chip away at the Honolulu Police Department’s backlog of about 1,500 of untested rape kits. The kits contain specimens and DNA evidence collected from sexual assault victims to be used as evidence.

Prevent coerced abortions, help rape-affected families, and test more rape kits? Win-win-win!

Related posts:

  1. Minnesota lawsuit argues coerced abortions violate parental rights
  2. NARAL believes pro-lifers are winning the online messaging battle
  3. Abortion Battle Becomes Jurisdictional
Tags: common ground, rape
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2016-04-05 11:18:002021-11-08 12:23:16Progress in the battle on rapist parental rights
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Debunking
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Livestream Recaps
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup
Why penalties for illegal abortion should not focus on the woman The Pro-Life Appeal to Agnosticism
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}

Subscribe for Livestream Updates and More

* indicates required

Interests

Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.