Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Presentations
    • Bridges Intensive
    • Building Bridges
    • Secular Post-Abortion Healing
    • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
    • Don’t Feed The Trolls
    • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • A Secular Case Against Abortion
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
      • Biology
      • Debunking
      • Dialogue strategy
      • Later Abortion
      • Legislation, laws, & court cases
      • Religion
      • We Asked You Answered
      • Your Stories
    • Research
      • What counts as an “abortion”?
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas (e-book)
      • Overview of SPL (brochure)
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (brochure)
      • 3 reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (flyer)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (brochure)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (flyer)
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum (e-book)
      • Fetal Remains Disposition Protocol
      • FAQ (flyer)
      • Presentations overview (card)
    • Store
  • Contact
    • General Inquiries
    • Book a Speaker
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
      • Your experiences with processing abortion
      • Pro-Life Medical Professionals survey
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Monica Snyder

Open letter to Trump Administration about ICE detention of pregnant women

February 11, 2026/in Administrative, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

Re: Protections for Pregnant, Postpartum, and Nursing Women in Immigration Custody

Dear President Trump, Secretary Noem, and Acting Director Lyons:

We write as pro-life organizations to urge the immediate reinstatement and enforcement of federal protections that prevent the detention of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women, except in truly exceptional circumstances. Pregnancy and early postpartum are medical states that require care that immigration detention facilities are structurally unable to provide.

Existing policy and its erosion

In 2016, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) adopted a presumption of release for pregnant women unless “extraordinary circumstances” required detention. That presumption was formally ended on December 14, 2017.[1] In July 2021, ICE issued new guidance stating that, absent narrow exceptions, ICE should not arrest or detain individuals known to be pregnant, postpartum, or nursing.[2]

Although this 2021 guidance has not been publicly rescinded, multiple reports indicate it is no longer being followed in practice.[3] ICE’s own web materials describing these protections have been labeled “archived” and “not reflective of current practice”.

Medical consensus

National medical organizations have warned that detaining pregnant women places both maternal and fetal health at serious risk. In a joint letter, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the American Academy of Family Physicians stated that ending presumptive release for pregnant detainees “puts the health of women and adolescents and their pregnancies at great risk.”[4]

Detention facilities routinely lack obstetric specialists, continuity of prenatal care, appropriate nutrition, and timely access to emergency treatment.[5] The physiological stress of detention itself is a known risk factor for pregnancy complications, preterm labor, and adverse neonatal outcomes.[6]

Documented impact

When ICE ended its presumption of release in 2017, detentions of pregnant women rose sharply. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, ICE detained 1,377 pregnant women in 2016 and 2,094 in 2018, an increase of approximately 52 percent.[7]

Medical advocacy groups and investigative reporting have documented prolonged detention of women with high-risk pregnancies, delayed emergency treatment, miscarriages, and stillbirths. [8] Simply stated, unborn children are dying because of this policy. These outcomes are not anomalies. They are the result of placing pregnant women in systems designed for incarceration, not medical care.

Our request

We respectfully urge your administration to:

  1. Formally reinstate and enforce the July 2021 ICE guidance prohibiting the arrest and detention of individuals known to be pregnant, postpartum, or nursing, except where release is legally prohibited or exceptional circumstances exist (such as national security or imminent risk of harm).
  2. Require ICE field offices to obtain headquarters-level approval before detaining any pregnant, postpartum, or nursing woman.
  3. Restore transparency by publishing semi-annual data on the number of pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women in ICE custody and the justification for each detention, as previously required by Congress.
  4. Review all current cases and immediately release pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women who do not pose a genuine security threat.

Alternatives to detention, such as monitoring, check-ins, and community-based supervision, are well established, far less costly, and significantly more humane. These mechanisms preserve immigration enforcement while safeguarding maternal, fetal, and infant health.

Detaining pregnant and nursing women is not a necessary feature of immigration policy. Reinstating protections for pregnant, postpartum, and nursing women reflects sound medical judgment and responsible governance.

We respectfully urge you to act.

Sincerely,

Lauren Pope, Executive Director, Rehumanize International
Monica Snyder, Executive Director, Secular Pro-life
Scott Baker, Vice President of Public Affairs, Choose Life Coalition
Board of Directors, Feminists Choosing Life of New York
Josh Brahm, President & Co-Founder, Equal Rights Institute
Terrisa Bukovinac, Founder & CEO, PAAU
Kristen Day, Executive Director, Democrats for Life
Catherine Glenn Foster, M.A., J.D. President & CEO, First Rights Global
Karen Garnett, Vice President of National Expansion, Cogency Strategic
Levi Hart, CEO, Reach Reproductive Health
Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa, Founder & President, New Wave Feminists
Hayden Laye, Founder & Director, Pro-Life Greenville (SC)
Maria McFadden Maffucci, Editor in Chief, Human Life Review
Monica Migliorino Miller, President, Citizens for a Pro-Life Society
Melissa Ohden, Founder & CEO, Abortion Survivors Network
Nelly Roach, CEO, Choose Life
Eric J Scheidler, Executive Director, Pro-Life Action League
Jack Ternan, Chairman, American Solidarity Party
Franciscan Action Network
Dr. Charlie Camosy, pro-life ethicist
Canon Georgette Forney, President, Anglicans for Life
Herb Geraghty, Incarcerated and Pardoned Pro-Life Activist
Lauren Handy, Incarcerated and Pardoned Pro-Life Activist
Congressman Dan Lipinski, US IL-3, Retired
Dr. Sean Hutzler, MD FACEP FAAEM
Leah Libresco Sergeant, pro-life author
Lois Anderson, Executive Director, Oregon Right to Life
Dana DiMattia & Thomas Hill, Coalition Organizers, Virginians for Preborn Justice
Elizabeth Edmonds, Executive Director, Georgia Life Alliance
Melanie Garcia Lyon, Indiana Pro-life Activist
Melanie Salazar, Executive Director, Pro-Life San Francisco
Jonathon Keller, President, California Family Council


Protecting pregnant women in immigration custody
should be common ground.


ENDNOTES

[1] American Immigration Lawyers Association, ICE Ends Presumption of Release for All Pregnant Detainees (Directive 11032.3, Dec. 14, 2017), https://www.aila.org/infonet/ice-ended-presumption-of-release-for-all-pregnant

[2] ICE Directive 11032.4, Identification and Monitoring of Pregnant, Postpartum, and Nursing Individuals (July 9, 2021), archived copy via National Immigrant Women’s Advocacy Project, https://niwaplibrary.wcl.american.edu/pubs/ice-pregnant-postpartum-nursing-individuals

[3] See, e.g., ICE keeps detaining pregnant immigrants against federal policy, The 19th (Oct. 21, 2025), https://19thnews.org/2025/10/ice-detaining-pregnant-nursing-immigrants/; ICE keeps detaining pregnant immigrants against federal policy, LAist (Oct. 2025), https://laist.com/brief/news/politics/ice-keeps-detaining-pregnant-immigrants-against-federal-policy

[4] American Academy of Family Physicians, Joint Letter to DHS on Detention of Pregnant Women (AAP, ACOG, AAFP, Mar. 30, 2018), https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/advocacy/prevention/women/LT-DeputyDirectorHoman-033018.PDF

[5] U.S. Government Accountability Office, Immigration Detention: Care of Pregnant Women in DHS Facilities, GAO-20-330 (Mar. 2020), https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-20-330; Kramer C, et al. Shackling and pregnancy care policies in US prisons and jails. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2023;27:186-196; National Commission on Correctional Health Care. Pregnancy and postpartum care in correctional settings. January 2018.

[6] Dunkel Schetter C. et al., Contribution of maternal stress to preterm birth, Clinics in Perinatology (2011); Lilliecreutz C. et al., Effect of maternal stress during pregnancy on risk for preterm birth, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2016), https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3179976/

[7] U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-20-330, Table 2 (matched ICE records for 2016 and 2018), https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/707266.pdf[8] American Civil Liberties Union, Pregnant and Postpartum Women Face Neglect and Abuse in ICE Detention (Oct. 27, 2025), https://www.aclu.org/news/immigrants-rights/pregnant-and-postpartum-women-face-neglect-and-abuse-in-ice-detention; see also Associated Press, Advocacy groups say pregnant migrants suffered miscarriages in ICE custody, https://apnews.com/article/811f9f6b10ef42cc51c7c7d154046a30

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/letterwriting.jpg 467 700 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2026-02-11 16:22:402026-02-11 17:38:17Open letter to Trump Administration about ICE detention of pregnant women

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Debunking
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Livestream Recaps
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2026 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Study: fetuses show consciousness in second half of pregnancy
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}

Subscribe for Livestream Updates and More

* indicates required

Interests

Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.