Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Presentations
    • Bridges Intensive
    • Building Bridges
    • Secular Post-Abortion Healing
    • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
    • Don’t Feed The Trolls
    • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • A Secular Case Against Abortion
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
      • Biology
      • Debunking
      • Dialogue strategy
      • Later Abortion
      • Legislation, laws, & court cases
      • Religion
      • We Asked You Answered
      • Your Stories
    • Research
      • What counts as an “abortion”?
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas (e-book)
      • Overview of SPL (brochure)
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (brochure)
      • 3 reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (flyer)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (brochure)
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum (e-book)
      • Fetal Remains Disposition Protocol
      • FAQ (flyer)
      • Presentations overview (card)
    • Store
  • Contact
    • General Inquiries
    • Book a Speaker
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
      • Your experiences with processing abortion
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Monica Snyder

There’s no mass exodus of OBGYNs from pro-life states

November 3, 2025/in Debunking, Research, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

Article published in The Hill: “No, OBGYNs are not systematically fleeing states that banned abortion.” There’s been a lot of media coverage claiming that they are, but researchers in public health, medicine, and economics from Stanford, Berkeley, and elsewhere tried to look at this more analytically and found “no evidence of such an exodus.”

(Video also available on Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram.)

They found no evidence that OBGYNs were leaving states with abortion bans and no evidence that fewer OBGYNS were moving to states with abortion bans.

They took a closer look at the media coverage claiming otherwise and they found that basically a bunch of different reporters were interviewing the same 15 doctors. Keep in mind there are tens of thousands of OBGYNs in the United States.

They also emphasized that broader doctor shortage issues predate Dobbs and closure of L&D departments have been inappropriately attributed to Dobbs when there’s other problems. Specifically, they conclude:

Focusing on a physician exodus that is not actually happening distracts us from addressing the real, plentiful problems with the delivery of medical care.

This is so well said. There are many complex problems with American reproductive healthcare. Abortion advocates continually reduce these issues to a question of abortion access. Several examples:

Yeni Alvarez died at 31 weeks pregnant after persistent health problems in pregnancy combined with economic disadvantage and lack of access to quality healthcare. She had previously said that if a doctor had to choose between either her life or her unborn daughter’s life, they should prioritize her daughter. She gave zero indication she wanted an abortion. After her death, The New Yorker still framed her story as one of lack of abortion access. Details: New Yorker prioritizes abortion over reproductive justice

L&D units are closing in rural areas of the country. This is happening even in pro-choice states like California. Declining birth rates and aging populations mean rural maternity wards see fewer and fewer patients. Their fixed costs (24/7 staffing, maintaining facilities and equipment) don’t change much, but without sufficient patients their income declines. And often rural populations are on public insurance with lower reimbursement rates to hospitals. Meanwhile the fact of fewer patients makes it harder to recruit and retain staff or maintain staff clinical skills.

Issues of rural healthcare access have persisted for decades, yet abortion advocates will focus on closures in pro-life states and implausibly claim the primary factor is abortion bans. Details: Are OBGYNs fleeing Idaho because of abortion laws?

Maternal mortality rates on average are higher in pro-life states. These rates are affected by multiple factors, including maternal age trends, proportion of the population in rural areas, proportion of the population using public vs private health insurance, racial disparities, prevalence of chronic conditions (e.g. diabetes, hypertension), state polices regarding postpartum Medicaid coverage and maternal mental health care, and more.

Assessments that try to account for these factors show variable relationships between abortion laws and maternal mortality rates. Abortion advocates dismiss all of this to promote the narrative that abortion restrictions cause higher maternal mortality rates. Details: Maternal mortality rates in pro-life vs pro-choice states

There are a lot of approaches to improving reproductive healthcare that both pro-life and pro-choice people can support. For example, we could extend postpartum Medicaid coverage, fund scholarships or loan repayments for midwifery students in maternity care deserts, supply hospital L&D units with ready-to-use hemorrhage kits, etc. When activists push abortion as the only answer, they shift focus away from less controversial and more actionable solutions we should be working toward.


If you appreciate our work and would like to help, one of the most effective ways to do so is to become a monthly donor. You can also give a one time donation here or volunteer with us here.

Related posts:

  1. No, OBGYNs aren’t fleeing pro-life states
  2. Maternal mortality rates in pro-life vs pro-choice states
  3. Are OBGYNs fleeing Idaho because of abortion laws?
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/doctors-experts.png 1080 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2025-11-03 04:28:002025-10-30 09:37:54There’s no mass exodus of OBGYNs from pro-life states

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Debunking
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Livestream Recaps
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

How did you go from a latent to an activated pro-lifer? Pressure to abort for prenatal Down syndrome diagnosis
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}

Subscribe for Livestream Updates and More

* indicates required

Interests

Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.