Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Murder suspect uses pro-choice viability argument as defense

October 28, 2013/4 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Sarah Terzo

[Today’s post by Sarah Terzo is part of our paid blogging program. Sarah is a pro-life atheist, a frequent contributor to Live Action News, and the force behind ClinicQuotes.com.] 

Apple Valley, Minnesota prosecutors allege that Roger Holland killed his pregnant wife Marjorie and their 15-week-old unborn baby. Holland’s lawyers are defending him using the argument that the murder of the baby was, in fact, an illegal abortion. They claim that the killing of the baby fits the criteria for abortion rather than murder.

At 15 weeks, the baby in this case would have had all the organs in place and fully developed feet and hands. However, over 450 legal abortions are performed between 13 and 15 weeks’ gestation every day. Holland and his legal team are trying to exploit this inconsistency in the law that allows abortionists to kill unborn babies legally, but punishes non-medical-practitioners who kill these babies during the commission of a crime. Marsh Halberg, Holland’s attorney, contends that the unborn babies have no inherent right to life. He says that rather than murder, Holland should be tried for performing an illegal abortion, which carries a much lighter sentence.

Halberg attempted to have the murder charge for the baby dismissed, saying “The exact conduct [Holland] is being accused of is chargeable under a separate, less severe statute… If there are different statutes that can be used to penalize criminal conduct, then you should use the statute that most accurately depicts the crime involved.”

Halberg said of the unborn victim, “It’s not a separate interest at this point, because it’s not viable.”

Halberg also uses as part of his argument the case of Donald Wickstrom, who was convicted of illegal abortion after he beat his pregnant girlfriend and caused a miscarriage. In Wickstrom’s case, the mother survived the attack, but her 8-month-old baby died. Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom, who is prosecuting Holland’s case, moved to dismiss Halberg’s argument on a technicality, saying that the laws were different when Wickstrom’s crime was committed. Backstrom said that the use of the “illegal abortion” defense was “offensive and legally unsupported.”

If convicted of the death of Marjorie Holland, Roger Holland faces life in prison. The murder charge pertaining to the unborn baby would, therefore, not greatly affect the punishment that he is already facing. Even if his “abortion is not murder” strategy succeeds, it will not save him from life in prison if he is found guilty of the separate charge of murdering Marjorie Holland. Still, the use of this defense is appalling, and could have ramifications for future cases.

Related Posts

Tags: Sarah Terzo
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Sarah Terzo https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Sarah Terzo2013-10-28 11:36:002021-11-23 19:16:10Murder suspect uses pro-choice viability argument as defense
You might also like
Late-Term Abortion to Save a Mother’s Life: Two Doctors’ Perspectives
Women who’ve had abortions don’t owe loyalty to the abortion industry
“Sacrifice”
Pro-choice ethicists: OK to use aborted baby’s ovaries to create new children
Planned Parenthood: Committing an Abortion is Like Swimming
Loving Them Both
“To me, it was not an act of murder…”
Coerced abortion makes mockery of “choice”
4 replies
  1. Jameson Graber
    Jameson Graber says:
    October 28, 2013 at 12:16 pm

    It's striking that they would even do this, considering it doesn't change the sentence outcome. Still, in terms of recent legal precedent, they're probably right. That's the crazy world we live in.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Drew Hymer
    Drew Hymer says:
    October 28, 2013 at 3:37 pm

    Legally speaking (but certainly not morally speaking) the difference between murder and abortion is the mother's agreement to the killing. Illegal abortion is an abortion committed outside the law (for example, by a non-"physician") on a woman who wants her baby dead. In this case, there is no indication that the mother wanted her baby dead, so it's clearly not an illegal abortion. It's murder.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Tyrone Walker
    Tyrone Walker says:
    October 28, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    The baby either is or is not a human being. The mother wanting to keep it does not magically change its biology from non-human to human. This blog post is pointing the fact out that liberals cannot consistently defend the killing of an preborn child by another if it is not a person.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Clinton
    Clinton says:
    October 28, 2013 at 5:05 pm

    Drew was speaking legally. Legally under the law, whether or not the baby enjoys the protections of the law is dependent on whether or not the mother wants to keep the child. This doesn't make any logical sense, but it's still the way the law looks at unborn humanity.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Medication Abortion
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

As the national conversation on abortion intensifies, it’s more important than ever that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Please donate today.

DONATE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

THIS WEEKEND: National Community Baby Shower! Return of the Scourge, Part I
Scroll to top