Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Abortion advocates dance around personhood

November 1, 2011/0 Comments/in Legislation, laws, and court cases, Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

As many of you know, Mississippi voters will soon have the opportunity to recognize all human beings, from conception, as legal persons. Although personhood amendments have been tried before, this is the first with any real chance of passing, and so it’s gotten lots of media attention.

Pro-lifers are divided on the advisability of this strategy. Setting that aside, it’s interesting to see how the other side is reacting. Their responses have a clear pattern: they attack personhood for any reason other than their actual reason for opposing it. They oppose personhood amendments because they want abortion to remain legal– but the arguments they give in the media dance around that issue entirely. Instead, they claim that the amendment will ban contraception (it won’t), send women to prison for miscarrying (abortion will be subject to the same high standard of proof as any other crime), or could have all sorts of unintended consequences, like lowering the drinking age to 20 years and 3 months after birth. [That would hardly be the end of the world if it were true, but clever defendants have already tried that argument and been shot down by Mississippi courts. See McKenzie v. State, 946 So.2d 392 (Miss. Ct. App.) (holding that “a person’s age is calculated from birth” because “evidence of the date of birth is easier to certify than a date of conception”– which will still be true even if the personhood amendment passes).]

Abortion is quite clearly the focus of the personhood amendment. So why isn’t that the focus of the debate?

Simply put, pro-lifers are the majority in Mississippi. Abortion advocates cannot win on the merits of their case. So instead, they are trying to trick pro-life voters into believing that the personhood amendment will do something that it won’t.

This kind of innuendo and deception is unacceptable. It is also a taste of our future. As the pro-life majority grows nationwide, pro-choice groups will increasingly have to rely on these fringe issues. Let’s nip that in the bud right now. Whether or not Mississippi’s personhood amendment is ultimately successful, we must defeat Planned Parenthood’s propaganda.

Related Posts

Tags: personhood amendment, Planned Parenthood, sex education & contraception
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2011-11-01 14:01:002022-01-12 19:49:53Abortion advocates dance around personhood
You might also like
San Francisco abortion centers lose Planned Parenthood affiliation
Have you socked it to Planned Parenthood yet?
“Grassroots Defunding” Campaign Connects Women to PP Alternatives
FQHCs are the better alternative to Planned Parenthood
The dying gasps of an industry
Personhood Amendment in Mississippi Progresses
Planned Parenthood doesn’t require sonographer certification; pregnancy centers do
Today’s briefs
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Medication Abortion
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

© Copyright 2022 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Blurred lines. Pro-life updates from New York
Scroll to top