Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Upcoming event in Iowa

October 12, 2010/4 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

A coalition of Iowa pro-life organizations has announced a town hall meeting on the subject of telemed abortions. It will be held on Friday, October 22, 2010 at 5:30pm at the Downtown Church, 323 E Locust St. in Des Moines, Iowa. Invited speakers include a range of pro-life leaders, legislators, and political candidates.

Earlier that same day, the Iowa Board of Medicine will debate possible new guidelines on telemedicine, including telemed abortion.

Unfortunately, I don’t live anywhere near Iowa and will be unable to attend. If any SecularProLife.org members plan to go, we’d love to get your report.

Related Posts

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2010-10-12 22:23:002021-11-08 12:58:25Upcoming event in Iowa
4 replies
  1. Yonmei
    Yonmei says:
    October 13, 2010 at 10:07 am

    Suppose anyone at the "pro-life" event will discuss how to ensure every woman who needs an abortion can get one-to-one access to a pro-choice physician?

    …oh, that would be to assume they'd care about the women who have to have telemed abortions.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    October 13, 2010 at 7:04 pm

    And how do you suggest we get more abortionists? Have some sort of draft like we used to do for the army?

    If a woman truly "needs" an abortion (or else she will die), that's one thing. I'd rather one person die than 2. If she *wants* an abortion, that's another thing entirely. You don't get to kill your child for socioeconomic reasons.

    Log in to Reply
  3. The Alexir of Life
    The Alexir of Life says:
    October 13, 2010 at 10:02 pm

    A woman never needs an abortion to save her life. This is because killing a child, unborn or not, is not the cure for any known disease or condition (except may that of having no money). On the other hand, it is always perfectly legitimate to give necessary medical care to someone (pregnant or not) and while all due regard should be given to the life of the unborn sometimes healing the woman will sadly have the side effect and negative consequence of the unborn human dying (not being killed). This is sad, but is not abortion.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    October 17, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    I guess that's more of a semantics thing than anything.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Medication Abortion
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

© Copyright 2022 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Using graphic images as a message- right or wrong? Good news, bad news on free speech
Scroll to top