Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview of SPL
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum
      • FAQ
      • Presentations overview
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Oregon: Abortion Lobby Ramps Up Attack on Pregnancy Centers

April 26, 2013/2 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

[Today’s post was originally published at LifeNews.]

Oregon’s state
senate is considering an unconstitutional bill that would interfere with the
vital work of pregnancy resource centers—and if the legislation passes, it
could create a precedent for even worse attacks on pro-life charities and
individuals.

Pro-abortion
groups have been attempting to legislate against pregnancy centers for years,
usually through laws that require pregnancy centers to disclose that they do
not provide abortions. Such legislation
never requires abortion facilities to disclose what services they don’t offer (e.g., support for
women who give birth). The pro-abortion
objective is to give pregnant women the false impression that abortion centers
offer everything that pregnancy centers do and more. By driving women away from supportive
pregnancy centers and toward abortion businesses, they hope to increase
abortion profits.

Fortunately, the
courts have held that these laws are unconstitutional. Under the First Amendment, states can only
require disclosures in a commercial context, to protect people from fraud. Since pregnancy resource centers aren’t trying
to part anyone from their money—they are charities that offer all their services
free of charge—the government has no legitimate reason to interfere with their
speech.

But that isn’t
stopping abortion advocates in Oregon, who have proposed yet another bill, SB
490, attacking pregnancy centers. On top
of its unconstitutionality, SB 490 has three provisions that are especially
outrageous.

First, SB 490
would require pregnancy centers to give disclosures not once, not twice, but up
to five times for every client: on
advertisements, on the center website, at the door, in the waiting room, and
once more before she can receive services. Abortion supporters are arguing that SB 490’s five-time disclosure rule
merely implements “standard,
uncontroversial health-care requirements
.” These are, of course, the same abortion
advocates who abhor informed consent laws that require just one disclosure of abortion’s nature and risks
before a woman undergoes an irreversible procedure.

Second, SB 490
is full of vague language that will put pregnancy centers in constant fear of
legal problems. Disclosures must be
“conspicuous” enough for regulators. And
if the pregnancy center gets it wrong, there are fines of up to $10,000 a week!

Third, SB
490’s purported exemption for medical centers is practically non-existent. To qualify, the center must “employ” a
medical professional, even though pregnancy centers typically rely on
volunteers so that they can offer free services.   

Moreover, this
non-volunteer medical professional must be on site whenever a medical service
is administered, and SB 490 defines “medical services” to include pregnancy options counseling. That’s right: simply talking to someone about parenting, adoption, and abortion—what
caring pro-life people across the country do on a regular basis—is a “medical
service” requiring the presence of a doctor or nurse!  

Oregon has
attempted anti-pregnancy-center legislation before. But this time around, it is dangerously close
to passage. SB 490 has left the Health
Care and Human Services Committee and is now in the Senate Rules Committee,
which has the authority to work on Senate bills outside of the usual timeframe.

Americans
United for Life will continue to keep a close eye on this legislation and work
alongside other pro-life organizations to defeat it. You can help by contacting
Oregon state senators
in opposition to SB 490.

For Americans
United for Life’s complete analysis of SB 490, click
here
.

Related Posts

Tags: sidewalk counselors & crisis pregnancy centers
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2013-04-26 11:11:002023-12-20 09:36:31Oregon: Abortion Lobby Ramps Up Attack on Pregnancy Centers
You might also like
Who are Pro-Lifers?
MD Crisis Pregnancy Center Laws Challenged
NARAL believes pro-lifers are winning the online messaging battle
2024 Heartbeat International Recap
Good news, bad news on free speech
Planned Parenthood doesn’t require sonographer certification; pregnancy centers do
Midweek News Roundup: 03/16/11
Fixed that meme for you (young man who wants to buy a gun)
2 replies
  1. Ron Cole
    Ron Cole says:
    April 29, 2013 at 2:01 am

    Would I need to be an Oregon resident to contact their Senators to oppose the bill?

    Log in to Reply
  2. LevelUpPlease
    LevelUpPlease says:
    April 29, 2013 at 1:50 pm

    Wouldn't hurt, but I'm not sure how much weight your oppostion would have since you are not the lawmakers' constituent. Perhaps it would do better to support the anti-abortion-rights lobby in that state? You could always do both.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Gosnell trial updates “We don’t use the word ‘kill.'”
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.