Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

ProPublica can’t see malpractice, only abortion bans

November 10, 2024/in Legislation, laws, & court cases, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

[This article is a transcript of “ProPublica can’t see malpractice, only abortion bans,” courtesy of volunteer Ben Tomlin. If you’re interested in volunteering to transcribe more of our content, please complete our volunteer survey.]

This video is also available on Twitter/X, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.

Okay, ProPublica makes another attempt, “A Pregnant Teenager Died After Trying to Get Care in Three Visits to Texas Emergency Rooms.”

This is the story of Naveah Crain: she didn’t get the care she should have gotten at all, and she died. I will explain it in a second, but this story is a very obvious case of medical malpractice. ProPublica and outlets like it will scour medical records in states that have abortion bans, looking for malpractice obstetrics cases, and then try to make them about abortion bans.

It’s important to remember that medical malpractice happens in all states: it happens in states with abortion restrictions, it happens in states with no abortion restrictions, but they only want to look at the cases in states with abortion bans and then try to frame it this way.

That narrative, that abortion bans make doctors afraid to give appropriate care, really makes no sense in this story. The first hospital she went to diagnosed her with strep throat. They didn’t even investigate her symptoms. They didn’t seem to be worried about abortion bans or her pregnancy at all. Far more absurd, the second hospital, she screened positive for sepsis and then they told her she was fine to leave. What is that?

Please note, there’s nothing in this article to suggest that they secretly didn’t think she was fine to leave, they were just afraid to treat her because of abortion bans.

On the contrary, it looks like they were just idiots. She had gone to this second emergency room, and they had noted that she had a fever and a high pulse and other problems. They gave her IV fluids, they gave her antibiotics, they gave her Tylenol, and her fever didn’t go down, and her pulse remained high. And yet, OBGYN William Hawkins discharged her.

Hawkins had missed infections before. Eight years earlier, the Texas Medical Board found that he had failed to diagnose appendicitis in one patient and syphilis in another. In the latter case, the board noted that his error ‘may have contributed to the fetal demise of one of her twins.’ The board issued an order to have Hawkins’ medical practice monitored.

A Pregnant Teenager Died After Trying to Get Care in Three Visits to Texas Emergency Rooms, ProPublica

Do you think Hawkins missed diagnosing appendicitis and syphilis eight years prior because of Texas’ abortion ban?

More important question: Do you think the pretty obvious evidence in this story that this was straight medical malpractice will stop ProPublica from trying really hard to frame this as if Crain is a victim of the Texas abortion ban?

No, it won’t.

There are millions of women who have not received adequate healthcare for gynecological issues, for pregnancy related issues even when they carried the pregnancy to term, all sorts of things, but to hear ProPublica tell it, the only reason anyone would be experiencing medical malpractice related to obstetrics is because of an abortion ban. They say right here: “This is what pregnant women are now facing in states with strict abortion bans.” Not states without them? What’s the maternal mortality rate in pro-choice states? Is it zero? There are people in the comments on these stories and on our own content all the time talking about how they live in states that have little or no abortion restrictions, and they still struggle to get appropriate reproductive-related medical care.

[Read more – Are doctors afraid to manage miscarriages because of abortion bans?]

Here, ProPublica quotes whichever expert they picked to say, “pregnant women have become essentially untouchable.” There’s no math to that at all. There’s somewhere between 350,000 and 400,000 pregnancies in Texas every year.

Post-video edit: The above stat is an error. It’s actually between 350,000 and 400,000 live births in Texas every year. Since some pregnancies don’t end in live birth (miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion), live births represent only a proportion of total pregnancies. The number of pregnancies in Texas each year will be higher than 350,000 – 400,000, but unclear how high. That means the number of annual threatened miscarriages each year will be higher than what I calculated below. I leave the following calculation unchanged as a conservative estimate.

Let’s call it the midpoint: 375,000. About 25% of pregnancies are threatened miscarriages. About half of those actually result in miscarriage, so we’ll call that 12.5%. So what’s 12.5% of 375,000? Because that would be about how many times a year, back of the envelope, rough calculation, about how many times in Texas women have threatened miscarriages that end up being miscarriages. The math there is 46,875.

Let me repeat that: over 46,000 times every year in Texas there are women who have threatened miscarriages where they end up miscarrying. If pregnant women were essentially untouchable, you would be hearing never-ending stories of women unable to get the care that they need because the providers are saying they’re afraid of the law. The reality is that thousands of times a year, tens of thousands of times a year, Texas healthcare providers are helping women manage their miscarriages and their medical emergencies related to pregnancy appropriately.

In fact, it’s telling that ProPublica and outlets like it very clearly want to find stories of women dying because doctors are afraid to intervene. This is what they come up with: a situation where a woman goes to an ER that doesn’t even check to see why a pregnant woman is having abdominal pain and then goes to a second ER where the OBGYN has a history so poor that his practice was monitored because he missed diagnoses before, and he sees that she has signs of sepsis, and he says she’s fine and releases her anyway. That’s the story they come up with to try to say that abortion bans are causing problems.


If you appreciate our work and would like to help, one of the most effective ways to do so is to become a monthly donor (check the box for “show my support by making this a monthly donation”). You can also give a one time donation here or volunteer with us here.

Related Posts

Tags: debunking, media bias
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/jair-lazaro-0lrJo37r6Nk-unsplash.jpg?fit=1920%2C1080&ssl=1 1080 1920 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-11-10 04:45:002025-01-19 19:02:06ProPublica can’t see malpractice, only abortion bans
You might also like
No, OBGYNs aren’t fleeing pro-life states
NPR interviews abortion rights activists to determine if embryos have hearts
Some differences between embryos and parasites.
Victory for life, and potential pitfalls, in the Lone Star State
ProPublica tries again: responding to claims about Porsha Ngumezi’s death
International “unsafe abortion” studies are highly flawed
Did Texas’ Heartbeat Law increase infant mortality rates?
“There are no OB-GYNs out there who are going to perform an abortion on a viable baby.”

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

A discussion of later abortion with Jen Hamilton, L&D nurse Nevaeh Crain’s family says her death is being used for politics
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.