Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

What do they mean by “after-birth abortion”?

September 13, 2024/in Ableism, Later Abortion, Uncategorized /by Monica Snyder

This content is available in video form here, and in written form below the video. Also posted to Facebook and Twitter/X.

Regarding “after-birth abortion,” there are (at least) three distinctions to keep in mind.

1) There are distinctions between ending a pregnancy when there is an adverse prenatal diagnosis versus when there isn’t.

Sometimes parents will receive an adverse prenatal diagnosis, and they will opt for a peri- or post-viability premature induction of labor with the anticipation and hope of a live birth so they can say goodbye to their child.

Other times a woman will seek later aboriton when there is no adverse prenatal diagnosis, her life is not at risk, and there’s no medical emergency involved. This could be instead because she struggled with the decision to abort, she had a major change in life circumstances unrelated to medical issues, she struggled to get the time and money to get an abortion sooner, and/or she didn’t realize she was pregnant sooner. (More discussion here.)

Typically when a woman seeks a peri- or post-viability abortion on an otherwise healthy fetus, the abortion provider will induce fetal demise prior to inducing labor, most commonly by injecting feticide into the child’s heart, brain, or the amniotic fluid, less commonly by cutting the umbilical cord and waiting for the child to bleed out. These methods make a “failed” abortion ie a live birth very rare in cases of aborting healthy post-viable fetuses.

Still, given thousands of 21+ week abortions per year, mistakes can happen. And if a very premature baby is born with no prior adverse prenatal diagnoses to people who were just intending the child’s death, it’s not hard to see the conflations and perverse incentives when the people in the room are deciding whether to provide life-saving measures.

2) There are distinctions between prenatal diagnoses with different levels of severity.

There are some conditions where the child was highly unlikely to survive until birth in any case, and even less likely to survive long after. But there are other conditions where survivability is more variable. Even with Trisomy 13 and Trisomy 18, survival rates vary enormously depending on whether medical teams choose to provide similar interventions that they would to newborns with similar conditions (e.g. heart issues) but without trisomies.

[Read more – Medical community, ableism, and Trisomy 18]

There are also problems with inaccurate estimations of gestational age, inaccurate prenatal testing, false positive rates, etc, that could mean that an early induction of labor results in a live birth of a child who is a little more “compatible with life” than the parents or abortion provider anticipated. How are people making decisions about when to offer comfort care versus when to try to help babies survive?

3) There are distinctions between actively killing a child (imagery Trump brings to mind when he uses words like “execute”) and withholding potentially life-saving interventions from a child.

I would love to tell you that actively killing babies is never a part of this. I do believe it is exceedingly rare. But you need look no further than the (absolutely horrifying) grand jury report for the Kermit Gosnell case to see how (so-called) abortion providers and their staff can convince themselves that certain ethical distinctions (e.g. difference between injecting poison into a late-stage fetal heart versus snipping that minutes-later now-born child’s spinal cord) are not enormous, or apparently even that compelling.

[Read more – Is Gosnell America’s “Biggest Serial Killer”?]

Nevertheless, most of the discussion of “after-birth abortion” is, I think, really about fears that abortion providers have perverse incentives to exaggerate degrees of “incompatible with life” and withhold life-saving interventions in the rare cases when a child is born alive after abortion by mistake.

Are there a bunch of sociopathic providers “executing” otherwise healthy infants born alive after premature induction of labor? No.

But are these “failed abortion” cases limited to intended live births of babies with fatal anomalies so parents can say goodbye? Also no.


If you appreciate our work and would like to help, one of the most effective ways to do so is to become a monthly donor. You can also give a one time donation here or volunteer with us here.

Related Posts

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/what-do-they-mean-by-after-birth-abortion-Cover.jpg?fit=1080%2C1920&ssl=1 1920 1080 Monica Snyder https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Monica Snyder2024-09-13 04:39:002024-09-12 16:42:59What do they mean by “after-birth abortion”?

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Summary: Disobedience, Medicine, and the Rule of Law Pro-life people hold signs outside the Supreme Court. One sign says "Love them Both" and another says "Atheist Against Abortion." We Asked, You Answered: Pro-Life Policy Priorities
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.