Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview of SPL
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum
      • FAQ
      • Presentations overview
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

New Artificial Wombs Challenge Pro-Choice Ethicists

January 29, 2024/in Biology, Bodily Rights, Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss, Personhood, Uncategorized /by Virginia Pride

Photo Credit: Marcelo Leal on Unsplash

The Problem of Premature Birth

Premature birth is a complication involving the birth of a baby before 37 weeks of pregnancy. 1 in 10 babies are born premature, with Black babies facing the greatest risk. Premature births have also risen by 4% in the U.S. from 2020 to 2021 (it is possible that the pandemic influenced this increase). 

While initiatives such as March of Dimes aim to decrease the rates of preventable premature birth, it is still a problem that can lead to various health problems in the infant. Also important to note are obstetric emergencies where delivering a child full term would be a risk to the mother’s life and health, and so an induced early delivery may be necessary – even if done so before viability.

A Technological Solution 

Enter the artificial womb. It first made headlines in 2017 with the gestation of lambs. In 2023, The MIT Technology Review covered the possibility of artificial wombs gestating humans instead of animals, in their final research trials. 

The specific model in question is EXTrauterine Environment for Newborn Development (EXTEND), which uses lab-made amniotic fluid to help the baby “breathe”; tubes are inserted into umbilical cord vessels to transfer nutrients and oxygen.  

EXTEND, like other artificial womb models also being developed, are complicated in design due to the numerous mechanisms (some still unknown) involved with pregnancy. As the FDA reviews the process, scientists and activists discuss valid ethical concerns — among them, access to abortion. 

Artificial Wombs Force Re-Examination of Abortion Language 

Bio-ethicist Vardit Ravitsky speaks candidly with MIT Tech Review about how the use of artificial wombs for micro-premies (babies born before 25 weeks) may complicate law surrounding a woman’s access to abortion around the same gestational age. She asks, “When we say that a woman has the right to terminate, do we mean the right to physically separate from the fetus? Or do we mean the right not to become a biological mother?” (Note: Monica Snyder addresses this talking point here.)

Ravitsky also posits another curveball for abortion laws: “What’s a fetus, what’s a baby, what’s a newborn, what’s birth, what’s viability?”

Previous Pro-Life Commentary on Artificial Wombs and Perinatal Medicine

This concern posited by pro-choice ethicists is nothing new. Leslie Corbly and Alex Hyun responded to pro-choice criticism and logic, respectively, in relation to the first generation of artificial wombs. SPL has also commented in the past on how abortion has negatively impacted perinatal medicine. 

Parents are often not told about options for continuing pregnancy after a diagnosis, may have medical care denied to their micro-premie (baby born at 23 weeks or sooner), or have their pregnancy loss minimized. And in cases of obstetric emergencies, such as the Kate Cox case, parents may face the obstacle of risking their health or life should they carry to term, with abortion presented as the only option.

Thanks to the artificial womb, it seems that the problem has flipped on itself and is questioning those who would dehumanize the unborn. 

Welcoming Artificial Wombs as Tools for Challenging Conversations 

Pro-lifers of all stripes can answer Ravitsky’s questions without trouble. A fetus is an unborn human being developing at and past the 8th week of pregnancy. A newborn is a human being at the stage of neonatal development, from birth to six weeks. Birth is the process by which a human being is born and their developmental stage changes from fetus to neonate, regardless if it is late or soon. Viability is just an arbitrary factor reflecting current medical limitations on how well they can keep that baby (which can be born or unborn) alive.

As for abortion supporters, they are left with the ethical dilemma that begs the question: is abortion meant to merely end a pregnancy, or kill a child?

For the pro-life person, the only dilemma is whether we are able to help our pro-choice neighbors see the humanity of the most helpless among us. Perhaps the artificial womb will aid us in that endeavor.

Related Posts

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/marcelo-leal-taF3klwwAWA-unsplash-scaled.jpg?fit=2560%2C1707&ssl=1 1707 2560 Virginia Pride https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Virginia Pride2024-01-29 04:03:002024-01-14 09:42:38New Artificial Wombs Challenge Pro-Choice Ethicists

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Susan Penner Interview with SPL’s Monica Snyder Pro-life people hold signs outside the Supreme Court. One sign says "Love them Both" and another says "Atheist Against Abortion." We Asked, You Answered: Pro-Life Priorities
Scroll to top
Manage Consent

To provide the best experience, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.