[Today’s guest post by Chandler Klebs is part of our paid blogging program.]
Consider this situation: A man chooses to have sex with a woman who he
knows will go for an abortion if she gets pregnant. She does get
pregnant. She goes to an abortionist, who performs the abortion. Which of
the three people killed the baby? The father, mother, or abortionist?
The father chose to do the one thing that could result in a pregnancy
the mother did not want. The mother chose to abort rather than seeking out alternatives. The abortionist was the final step
in causing the death of the baby.
Keeping all of that in mind, if you could go back and talk
to one of the people—the father, mother, or abortionist—and convince them to become pro-life, which one would you choose?
Again, there’s no one right answer, but I would pick the father. Talking to the abortionist could have a major impact if he’s the only abortionist in town and has no one to replace him, but otherwise, the mother will just go elsewhere for the abortion. Of course talking to the mother is good because if her mind changes, the child
will live. But will she have the support of the father? He had expected the mother to have an abortion even before they had sex, which implies
that he has no interest in taking care of the child.
Talking to the father makes sense because he has the power to change
his ways and stop creating children who will be killed. He also has
the ability to support the mother in taking care of the children he is
responsible for, making the mother less likely
to want to abort. Many women abort due to fear of being a single
Outreach to women in crisis pregnancy situations is great, but we need to make sure we’re reaching the men too, rather than placing all of the weight on the women. The idea that men are irrelevant to the
abortion debate is incredibly misguided.