Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

“The Miracle of Abortion”

July 11, 2013/15 Comments/in Uncategorized /by admin

Remember watching those awkward sex education videos when you were about eleven? Ever have to watch a live birth one?

The satirical online newspaper, The Onion, parodies the adolescent awkwardness of learning about sex with its article “8th-Grade Health Class Squirms Throughout Entire Screening Of ‘Miracle Of Abortion’.” Some excerpts and thoughts:

“During the video’s first 20 minutes, as the patient and various surgical tools were prepped for the procedure, the only noise reportedly made by the students was the sound of anxious fidgeting as they repositioned themselves in their seats. While many grew red in the face and giggled audibly at the first sight of the woman’s genitals, the chuckles are said to have quickly turned into gasps and groans of revulsion as the film approached its climactic scene of embryo evacuation.” 

Abortion rights proponents decry the use of graphic abortion photos as disturbing and irrelevant. As they point out, photos of open heart surgery could likewise look disturbing or disgusting, but that doesn’t necessarily mean open heart surgery is immoral.

But the revulsion we feel when seeing an abortion is fundamentally different
from the squeamishness of watching an open heart surgery; it is
the revulsion of watching a death. Our reaction is not based solely on “grossness” but also on an understanding of the meaning behind the disgust. It’s like the difference between watching a surgeon break a kid’s leg in order to set it so it will grow properly and watching an abusive parent break a kid’s leg. Yeah, they’re both “gross,” but they are entirely different and appropriately elicit different responses. I expect parents would feel very differently about allowing their children to watch one situation versus the other. It’s not about being gross, it’s about being horribly violent.

On the other hand, we do provide people–including our children and teenagers–with specific descriptions, photos, and sometimes video of the reproductive/birthing process. That information can also be disturbing and disgusting to kids, but as they become old enough to be sexually active it’s important they understand how their bodies work and what can happen as a result of their actions. Or, as The Onion puts it…


“Every year, there’s a lot of uneasiness when I show this video,” Flannery said. “I recognize it’s uncomfortable for kids their age to watch, but as they start to become aware of their own sexuality, it’s important they see what actually happens to the female body during abortion.”

Again, The Onion is a satirical newspaper. Still I couldn’t help but think, as I read the above, what a sad thought it is–as if abortion is so inevitable that we need to educate children on exactly how it works. And yet, in reality, is that so far off? Abortion isn’t exactly a rare event. Depending on which organization you look to for estimates, there are between 780,000 to 1,200,000 abortions in the US every year. According to Guttmacher, by age 45 about 1 in 3 American women have had an abortion. As Kathleen Parker of the Washington Post put it:

We have indeed come a long way from Roe v. Wade. In the early days of
legal abortion, nearly everyone insisted the procedure wasn’t intended
as birth control. Millions of abortions later, original intent is
laughable. Even Bill Clinton’s call for abortion to be safe, legal and rare has a fairy tale quality by today’s standards.

(You should read her whole piece, by the way. It was excellent.)

Again, from The Onion:


In both the moments leading up to and immediately following the screening of the film, health teacher Diane Flannery, 53, is said to have reminded the unsettled students that the events depicted on screen were 100 percent real, and simply a natural part of life and sexual behavior.

I don’t know about “natural.” But “common”? Sadly, yes.

Related Posts

Tags: graphic images, Laura Nicholson
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 admin https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png admin2013-07-11 11:29:002021-11-08 12:36:07“The Miracle of Abortion”
You might also like
Aborting to protect our bodies?
How do we form opinions?
Unborn Parasite?
Two-year-olds, cats, and parasites.
The Larger Agenda
More lies in abortion “counseling” exposed
Violation of Constitutional Rights – AB 123
Dear Jezebel: Real friends don’t count chromosomes.
15 replies
  1. Janet Susan
    Janet Susan says:
    July 11, 2013 at 11:47 am

    Good distinction. It's fascinating to me how those who support abortion are so against viewing it or speaking of it for what it really is. I wonder if graphic descriptions of the various abortion techniques as part of sex education for junior high students would have any impact on the choice of abortion.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Jameson Graber
    Jameson Graber says:
    July 11, 2013 at 12:03 pm

    I admit that my blood starts pumping faster when the issue of abortion images comes up. Images were all it took to make me pro-life. So when someone tells me I just need to "get over it" (as has happened on more than one occasion) I admit I start to snap. Something inside me wants to throttle people and ask, "What the hell is wrong with you?"

    Abortion is a very depressing issue for me, mostly because it makes me realize how non-universal our moral intuitions are.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Jan
    Jan says:
    July 11, 2013 at 12:56 pm

    I recently challenged friends to read Dr. Nathanson's The Hand of God, and one guy said "I've seen the gruesome photos." As if that's a reason not to debate with pro-lifers.

    Hey, guess what? Abortion is GRUESOME!

    Log in to Reply
  4. Crystal Kupper
    Crystal Kupper says:
    July 11, 2013 at 3:15 pm

    If abortion is no big deal, like all my pro-choice friends contend, then why is looking at it so bad? Why not know what actually happens?

    Log in to Reply
  5. DJ
    DJ says:
    July 11, 2013 at 7:02 pm

    So shouldn't they be against war photos showing US soldiers pissing on Muslims, drone striking innocent civilians, and Muslims decapitating US soldiers and other Muslims? I suppose the photos are all irrelevant and shouldn't change anyone's opinions of the war.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Histpoli Buff
    Histpoli Buff says:
    July 11, 2013 at 7:36 pm

    Can't believe fit would happen!

    Log in to Reply
  7. Anita
    Anita says:
    July 12, 2013 at 4:20 am

    Keeping the ugly and horrific realities of abortion sanitized and in the dark makes it easier to support. It's that simple. As I get older and more vocal about my own rights and my own opinions on many issues like abortion, I find it comforting to know that there are many out there in my own party who actually don't support abortion or how it's performed. I wish the media wouldn't marginalize such voices. Grateful for this blog.

    Log in to Reply
  8. ockraz
    ockraz says:
    July 12, 2013 at 1:27 pm

    "there are between 780,000 to 1,200,000 abortions in the US every year"

    The first number is CDC and always majorly underrepresents the total. They rely on state data and some states don't report – for example California doesn't and it has 20-25% of the national total.

    Log in to Reply
  9. DianaG2
    DianaG2 says:
    July 25, 2013 at 6:33 pm

    Wow, that is a REALLY GOOD POINT!

    If they see it, they will know for sure what a big deal it really is!

    Log in to Reply
  10. DianaG2
    DianaG2 says:
    July 25, 2013 at 6:34 pm

    Good point also!! You guys are awesome.

    Log in to Reply
  11. DianaG2
    DianaG2 says:
    July 25, 2013 at 6:36 pm

    The Gestapo also kept their dirty little deeds secret and in the dark. The German people did not know what was going on in those death camps.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Alden Smith
    Alden Smith says:
    July 28, 2013 at 3:43 am

    If abortionist cant stand the images then get out of the debate.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Alden Smith
    Alden Smith says:
    July 28, 2013 at 3:45 am

    Out of site out of mind

    Log in to Reply
  14. Nancy
    Nancy says:
    July 29, 2013 at 1:46 am

    Well, I wonder if our moral intuitions are not universal??

    Sometimes, I think, "Methinks the pro-choicer doth protest too much."

    Meaning: Denial? Desperation? Terror? Where is this rage coming from? I've never been in a discussion with a pro-choice person who wasn't calling names and insulting me

    A few pro-lifers have done this, as well, of course, but it seems pretty rare for pro-lifers to be so unreasonable.

    Log in to Reply
  15. DianaG2
    DianaG2 says:
    July 29, 2013 at 2:05 am

    Yes, so true.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Pro-choice groups say subway ads are a form of intimidation Don’t Impose Your Science on Me!
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.