Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

PP moves away from “pro-choice” label.

January 15, 2013/6 Comments/in Uncategorized /by admin
[Today’s post is re-posted from “Yeah, but…“]

Planned Parenthood is moving away from the term “pro-choice” in response polls showing dissatisfaction with abortion debate labels.

“I’m
neither pro-choice nor pro-life,” said one woman in a focus group
commissioned by Planned Parenthood. “I’m pro-whatever-the-situation is.”
Said another, “there should be three: pro-life, pro-choice and
something in the middle that helps people understand circumstances […]
It’s not just back or white, there’s grey.”

Over at Slate magazine, Amanda Marcotte was frustrated with this response.  She claims that people who are “pro-whatever-the-situation-is” are pro-choice.

But if the women mean, as I suspect they do, that they are not pro-abortion but rather pro- a woman being able to make her decision based on her circumstances, that is the very definition of pro-choice.

This
is also my understanding of the term “pro-choice.” And I expect it’s
the understanding of most pro-choice activists. But is that how the term
“pro-choice” translates to the general public–to people who aren’t
particularly involved in the abortion debate? Based on Planned
Parenthood’s research and response, it seems a lot of people hear
“pro-choice” and feel it implies something more, a stronger stance.

It’ll
be interesting to see whether Planned Parenthood can transcend abortion
debate labels. I think labels help people succinctly explain their
perspectives; it just gets cumbersome trying to impart all the nuance
every time you speak on a topic. I think the labels “pro-life” and
“pro-choice” are going to be around for a long while still, but if
they’re not, I’m interested to see what takes their place.

Related Posts

Tags: Laura Nicholson, Planned Parenthood, rhetoric
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 admin https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png admin2013-01-15 14:54:002021-11-08 12:38:53PP moves away from “pro-choice” label.
You might also like
Slimy “double-abortion” scheme at Planned Parenthood
What You Can Do on Planned Parenthood’s 100th Anniversary
Gosnell and Abortion, Part 2 of 3
Time to defund Planned Parenthood
Obama and abortion in the courts
Facts are not gaffes
Planned Parenthood Golden Gate update
You can be pro-choice without supporting Planned Parenthood
6 replies
  1. Jameson Graber
    Jameson Graber says:
    January 15, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    I think the pro-choice advocates are missing something here. People don't like pro-"choice" because they don't think the issue is merely about exercising autonomy. I would guess that many people who accept abortion–who are effectively pro-choice–still hope it can become less common. In other words, it doesn't just depend on the woman's situation, in the sense that whether or not to buy a car depends on your situation. The reason there's "grey" for people on this issue is that they sense that the whole thing's a tragedy, everything from what leads to abortion to the thing itself, yet there's just no good solution. I think that's what people need a word for.

    Log in to Reply
  2. M
    M says:
    January 15, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    Excellent point. Maybe you could write a short SPL post about this?

    Log in to Reply
  3. Kara Baylog
    Kara Baylog says:
    January 15, 2013 at 5:39 pm

    Yes. Perhaps part of their problem is that until recently, the pro-choice banner has included everyone from those chanting, "Free abortion on demand without apology" to people who just want to see exceptions for heath, rape and incest. I've been told by people in the past that I am pro-choice for those very reasons. (I disagreed but the point remains). A lot of people don't want to associate with that extreme idea. I kind of feel like the whole pro-choice movement is doing what the NRA is doing. At one point, it was there in response to a genuine problem (protection of women/ protection of reasonable gun rights) but once they won their big battle, they try to stay relevant by demanding extreme measures (abortion on demand/ legality of ownership of assault weapons by just about anyone)

    Log in to Reply
  4. Michael Grady
    Michael Grady says:
    January 15, 2013 at 6:01 pm

    Pro-choice advocates are not fond of their label because choices often lie between good and evil. I say this because in actuality, everyone "chooses": anyone can choose life and anyone can end life. Since there is nothing wrong about choosing to let an unborn life live, there is something at the very least intuitively wrong in the pro-choice mind with the thought or action of ending a life. They are bothered by it, and justifiably so. It is showing and often obvious. How the mentality has lasted even this long is a testament to the depth of the very nature of the evil deeds one human can do to another, whether in the womb or out of it (ie, wars, terrorist actions, bullying, etc).

    Log in to Reply
  5. Ashley Wool
    Ashley Wool says:
    January 16, 2013 at 2:01 am

    Of course she's "pro-whatever-the-situation-is." Because she wants to keep her job. As long as Planned Parenthood runs abortion clinics, they are pro-abortion, no matter what else they want to call themselves.

    Log in to Reply
  6. Clinton Wilcox
    Clinton Wilcox says:
    January 16, 2013 at 8:08 am

    Planned Parenthood has never been pro-choice — they are, and have always been, pro-abortion. They believe in abortions through all nine months with no restrictions, and constantly and consistently fight tooth-and-nail against common sense legislation, even legislation designed to help protect women/girls.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Medication Abortion
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

As the national conversation on abortion intensifies, it’s more important than ever that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Please donate today.

DONATE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Three articles worth reading We remember
Scroll to top