Drexel needs a civics lesson
Kelsey speaking. It’s hard to believe that my graduation from the University of Virginia School of Law is just two months away! In light of this approaching milestone, I decided to revisit an issue from early in my law school career: namely, whether or not the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University in Philadelphia still fails to grasp basic concepts of constitutional law. The answer, sadly, is yes.
Way back in the fall of 2009, when I was a bright-eyed, bushy-tailed first-year law student, I noticed that Drexel Law encouraged students to be abortion center escorts as part of its pro bono (volunteer) program. The school website noted the possibility that pro-life sidewalk counselors and protesters might “violate the First Amendment.” There’s just one problem: it is legally impossible for a private party to violate the First Amendment! Even then, I knew (and my past two and a half years of legal education have confirmed) that the Bill of Rights limits actions by state officials. For example, the First Amendment is violated when police officers arrest pro-lifers who are engaged in peaceful protests. Sidewalk counselors talking to abortion-minded women? Not a First Amendment violation by any stretch of the imagination.
Almost three years later, Drexel still hasn’t learned this basic civics lesson (click to enlarge):
 |
|
Abortion Clinic Escort Sevice–LSRJ Run Project
Students are trained in First Amendment Law and observe protestors
outside of abortion clinics to make sure they do not overstep their bounds.
Students will escort the women to the clinic, keeping track of protesters
action (sic). Should a protester violate the First Amendment, the student
escort will take a full report of the incident and file his or her notes of the
incident with the Court. If you are interested in participating in this project,
please contact LSRJ or Karen Pearlman Raab for specific requirements and
time commitments.
|
Interestingly, another Drexel pro bono project– the “NLG Legal Observer Program”– has a much better grasp of the First Amendment. That project encourages students to observe public demonstrations and record “any behavior on the part of law enforcement that appears to restrict demonstrators’ ability to express their political views.” Just so long as it isn’t a pro-life demonstration, apparently.
But getting back to the “Abortion Clinic Escort Service” project: you may have noticed that it is run by LSRJ. “LSRJ” is “Law Students for Reproductive Justice,” a pro-abortion advocacy group. Drexel’s chapter of LSRJ also encourages law students to help children get abortions behind their parents’ backs, through the “Judicial Bypass Intake” project (click to enlarge):
 |
| Judicial Bypass Intake–LSRJ Run Project Some young women decide they cannot tell their parents about their pregnancy. A judicial bypass is an order from a judge that allows a minor to have an abortion without telling or receiving consent from her parent or legal guardian. Assist these girls seeking attorney representation at their judicial bypass hearing by conducting in depth intake review and filing out the Petitions to File with the Court. If you are interested in participating in this project, please contact LSRJ or Karen Pearlman Raab for specific requirements and time commitments. |
“Pro bono” is short for pro bono publico, which in Latin means “for the public good.” Facilitating the deaths of unborn children, intimidating pro-life sidewalk counselors with bogus legal threats, and misinforming students about constitutional law is a far cry from the public good! And it gets worse: a 2010 health inspection found that the Philadelphia Planned Parenthood on Locust Street, which is less than 10 minutes away from the law school, failed to give adequate follow-up care to abortion patients. I wonder: will LSRJ be there for the 15-year-old girl they assisted in getting a secret abortion, when she’s in pain and alone in the Planned Parenthood recovery room?
I suggest that we exercise our First Amendment rights by sending polite emails to Karen Pearlman Raab, the law school’s Director for Pro Bono and Public Interest Programs, asking her to reform the pro bono program so that it truly advances the public good. Her email address is karen.a.pearlman@drexel.edu.
Well said, Kelsey.
I don't see Drexel Law (or any major universities for that matter) encouraging students to help at pregnancy resource centers or monitor the pro-abortion shenanigans at pro-life events.