Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

American Atheists convention: day 2

March 26, 2012/7 Comments/in Religion /by Kelsey Hazzard

Kristine: A comment on yesterday’s blog pointed out that “being an atheist does not automatically make one open minded.”  In my experience at the rally and atheist convention I would agree wholeheartedly with that statement.  Despite the many great and reasoned conversations that we had, there were sadly some who simply refused to form a reasoned argument.


It’s what I call “putting down a roof and calling it a house” or in rhetorical terms “begging the question.”  An assertion is not an argument.  A conclusion is not a reason. 
“It’s my choice, it’s my body!” declared one woman.  No matter how many times I tried to engage her with questions about how location is morally relevant, again and again she repeated “Because – it’s my body. So it’s my choice.”

A similar response came from a woman who asked me how many children I had and walked away with a smug look after I told her I had none. Our table-mate Micheal faced similar attacks when it was pointed out that he could not get pregnant.  I was saddened by this.  At an event that claims to live by reason and rational thought, how is attacking the character of the person making the argument the least bit valid?  Even if I’m a bigoted, sexist, horrible person who enjoys kicking children and eating human flesh – you still need to address my arguments on their own merit.

Kelsey: We had a few fun debates. A couple of people said that they would “draw the line” when the heartbeat or brain waves begin. I smiled and informed them that those events happen so early that if you think abortion is wrong after that point, you are in effect pro-life.  They didn’t seem to mind.  But it makes no difference to me whether or not they adopt a certain label.

Kristine:   Yes, thankfully there were many who took the time to think about the issues and to engage in a mutual challenge of ideas.  “I’m pro-choice but I’m glad you guys are here,” said another young man, after a lengthy discussion between a pro-life couple and a pro-choice couple broke out next to our table.  “It takes courage to voice a minority view in an atmosphere like this.”


Indeed, we will continue to be a voice. Atheists are diverse, and some of us believe that women’s rights can be had without sacrificing the lives of the smallest members of our species.


Kelsey
: Today was a bit more low-key in the exhibitors’ room than yesterday, so I got the chance to attend a session in the main ballroom entitled “The Image of the Atheist Community.” It was presented by well-known author and radio host Jamila Bey. She had a number of suggestions for improving secular activism, including 1) fostering a sense of community, 2) “starting them young” by encouraging children to develop an interest in science, and 3) refusing to become complacent. These steps would be helpful for the pro-life movement as well– or any other social movement, for that matter. Excellent advice.


Kristine: Finally, we’re now famous!  Well, sort of.  I was interviewed for not one but two documentaries.

Kelsey: Such an overachiever 😉

Kristine: One documentary producer was “personally pro-life” and engaged me in a very good dialog about secular pro-life arguments.  The second documentary maker was so impressed with my speaking and ability to articulate my position that he told me he’d like to have me as a spokesperson for American Atheists.   I wonder how well that would go over in the atheist community! 🙂

Kelsey: Thanks everyone for your support and encouragement this weekend.  We’re psyched to have had the chance to engage in this vital outreach.

Related Posts

Tags: secularism
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2012-03-26 22:13:002021-11-24 15:55:53American Atheists convention: day 2
You might also like
What do the numbers tell us?
Support your local march for life
In two weeks…
We are here.
Pro-life atheist’s review of 180 Movie
Scatterbrained Sunday: Lessons from this weekend
Walk for Life West Coast 2013
Secular Pro-Life’s Christian Outreach
7 replies
  1. DiscountDeity
    DiscountDeity says:
    March 27, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    Can someone please clarify the theological position of this blog? The "Secular" part of the title, as well as this post in particular, seem to imply it is by and for non-religious people.

    But elsewhere I've read statements that imply it's not necessarily non-religious, but simply an attempt to highlight non-religious pro-life arguments, by and for the religious and non-religious alike.

    Which is fine, if that's your thing. But I worry that one's ability to construct logical arguments may be affected by any religious ideologies that person may hold that are influencing their final conclusion.

    Which, of course, does not necessarily make those arguments wrong. But full disclosure about such biases seems to be in order, particularly when one is seeking support from atheists at an atheist conference.

    Log in to Reply
    • secularprolife.org
      secularprolife.org says:
      March 28, 2012 at 1:19 am

      Secular Pro-Life is led by atheists, and that's the backbone of our membership. But we also have members from religious minorities (e.g. Buddhists, Wiccans, etc.) who obviously aren't fans of the conservatives who think they're going to hell, and moderate/liberal Christians who recognize the value of separating church and state.

      That said, you don't have to be a member to comment on the blog. Sometimes people we've never seen come here and start spouting religious stuff or pro-abortion stuff. We don't believe in censorship, so unless they stoop to name-calling, we usually don't block them.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Monte Harms
    Monte Harms says:
    March 28, 2012 at 1:29 am

    Secularprolife is also followed by very conservative Christians such as myself. It's important to hear pro-life defenses from all sides. In fact, sometimes it's beneficial not to argue the pro-life message from just a Christian viewpoint. If the person you're trying to persuade to be pro-life is not a Christian, then you are having two battles: trying to convince them of the validity of Christianity and then also trying to have them become pro-life.

    Log in to Reply
  3. DiscountDeity
    DiscountDeity says:
    March 28, 2012 at 3:15 pm

    secularprolife.org:

    "Secular Pro-Life is led by atheists"

    Thank you for the clarification. I admit I was a bit confused when I saw quotes like this one:

    "SecularProLife.org isn't about Christian-bashing or arguing over church and state issues. We count many Christians among our membership, including me." – Kelsey Hazzard, founder and president of SecularProLife.org

    (source: http://www.standforlife.net/2010/05/secularprolifeorg-making-secular.html)

    Now, I don't object to Kelsey's right to be a Christian. I also admit that her religious beliefs may have evolved in the time since she wrote that.

    However, I believe there is a notable difference between arriving at a pro-life position via strictly secular, scientific reasoning, and merely constructing an ex post facto rationalization for a theological conclusion that happens to omit religious references. The latter strikes me as a touch intellectually dishonest (see also: "Intelligent Design").

    I think that if there are legitimate scientific or secular reasons to support the pro-life position, they are worth noting.

    However, if the pro-choice position is ultimately inseparable from religious or philosophical beliefs, it would seem to be inappropriate for the USA to pass anti-choice legislation, as that would amount to forcing religious beliefs on those who don't share that belief (which would not only be unconstitutional, but hypocritical, given the recent controversy over birth control coverage).

    Of course, an argument does not hinge on the religion of the person making it, which is why I've been separately discussing those arguments in another thread.

    However, I feel that when an organization seeks support at an atheist event, honesty would dictate that they should disclose any theological conflicts. I'm sure you understand why I would be skeptical of the credibility of anyone who misrepresented themselves in the service of their ideology.

    Log in to Reply
    • secularprolife.org
      secularprolife.org says:
      March 28, 2012 at 3:23 pm

      Yes, it's a matter of Kelsey's religious beliefs evolving in the intervening years. Her two right-hand people (Monica and Phil) have been atheist from the beginning.

      Log in to Reply
    • secularprolife.org
      secularprolife.org says:
      March 28, 2012 at 3:38 pm

      http://blog.secularprolife.org/2012/03/personal-note.html

      Log in to Reply
  4. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:
    April 3, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    great work guys!
    thank you : )

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

October Baby Opening Weekend Through the Looking Glass.
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.