Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Myths
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
    • Publications
      • Overview Brochure
      • Why Secular People Should Care
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Why support SPL?
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

The 26 Effect

November 10, 2011/5 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

My apologies for not posting the last few days. Let’s take a look at the biggest story we missed: the vote on personhood in Mississippi.

You’re probably aware that Mississippi’s personhood amendment (Initiative 26) did not pass, despite looking like it would pass by a wide margin just a few weeks ago. Various groups have attempted a post-mortem examination. The most common explanations are that the sham group “Mississippians for Healthy Families” flooded the airwaves with misinformation, and that some pro-life leaders vocally opposed the amendment on strategic grounds.

Those are undoubtedly correct reasons. I’d like to offer one more theory: a cousin of the Bradley effect.

The Bradley effect, as you may know, concerns race:

[S]ome voters will tell pollsters they are undecided or likely to vote for a black candidate, while on election day they vote for the white candidate. It was named after Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, an African-American who lost the 1982 California governor’s race despite being ahead in voter polls going into the elections. The Bradley effect theorizes that the inaccurate polls were skewed by the phenomenon of social desirability bias. Specifically, some white voters give inaccurate polling responses for fear that, by stating their true preference, they will open themselves to criticism of racial motivation.

Bias against unborn children is pervasive in our society. Some even feel outright hostile toward them; think of epithets like “parasite.” But as the pro-life movement gains in popularity, it is socially undesirable for voters to admit those feelings to pollsters. Instead, some may publically say that they support human rights for the preborn, then vote against those rights in the privacy of the voting booth.

Call it the 26 effect.

Related Posts

Tags: personhood amendment, race
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
  • Link to Instagram
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2011-11-10 15:13:002021-11-08 12:53:51The 26 Effect
You might also like
NRLC Convention Day Three
7 things pro-lifers wish our pro-choice friends understood about us.
Facts are not gaffes
Who are Pro-Lifers?
Mississippi Personhood Amendment
Douglas Karpen is the New Kermit Gosnell
Justice in the Face of Unknowing
Recap: Let There Be Life Conference 2018 at UC Berkeley
5 replies
  1. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:
    November 10, 2011 at 3:58 pm

    The Bradley effect might also be called the "sounded good at first but then we learned more about it effect." When pro-life voters learned, for example, that it could possibly be overturned in court and uphold Roe, they realized it's not a panacea for ending abortion.

    Log in to Reply
  2. M
    M says:
    November 10, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    Interesting theory, but it has not been my experience that people are shy about opining that it's utterly ridiculous to think personhood begins at conception. Maybe it depends on where you live?

    Log in to Reply
  3. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:
    November 10, 2011 at 7:00 pm

    The Mississippi personhood amendment did absolutely nothing to support the personhood of women who need support to prevent unintended pregnancies, or get through & beyond them. No antiabortion law has any business omitting such measures.

    Log in to Reply
  4. AngelaG
    AngelaG says:
    November 10, 2011 at 8:17 pm

    As a Louisianian with family in Mississippi, I don't think voters were saying one thing and voting another. Mississippi is very pro-life, but I think the most likely reason it was defeated is that Mississippi has a problem with teen pregnancies and there was a lot of fear-mongering going on about how the Initiative would ban certain types of birth control.

    Plenty of MS parents (and I know several of them) are already helping to raise their grandchildren while the young parents finish school; and while none of those grandparents would trade the babies for anything, that doesn't mean they want to lost the tools (the pill, other chemical BC) that help prevent more babies.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Jewels Green
    Jewels Green says:
    November 13, 2011 at 2:06 pm

    This is a fascinating theory.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Administrative
  • Adoption and Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Late-Term Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, and court cases
  • Medication Abortion
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • SPL Emails
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Your Stories

Archive

As the national conversation on abortion intensifies, it’s more important than ever that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Please donate today.

DONATE
© Copyright 2023 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

508 babies saved in 40 Days campaign International Pro-Life Youth Conference
Scroll to top