Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

What about civil disobedience?

October 24, 2011/3 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

A few days ago, Jewels Green, who is a former abortion center employee turned pro-lifer, contributed a blog post entitled “Pro-life and committed to ending abortion: but NOT by any means necessary.” In it, she expressed her opinion that the pro-life movement should refrain from any violence or unlawful activity, which she says “provides our pro-abortion opposition a speedy on-ramp to the high road and fosters a ‘comrades-in-arms’ mentality that unifies their ranks and galvanizes public opinion in their favor.”

Although no one disagreed with her point about violence, some objected to her statement that “Even humorously suggesting a return to the era of blockading entrances to clinics or ‘occupying’ the waiting rooms of abortion clinics leads down the slippery slope to further lawlessness” and violence. But this did not adequately address activity that is both peaceful and illegal— i.e. non-violent civil disobedience, in the tradition of Martin Luther King, Jr. and other social justice leaders.

Civil disobedience may or may not be appropriate, depending on the time and circumstance. This is a matter on which reasonable people can disagree.

In the interest of fostering open discussion, here is a pro-civil-disobedience response, by Stand True president Bryan Kemper:

In a recent article written by Jewels Green, she asks the following question to open her article:

“Should breaking the law be advocated to advance the cause for life? Should violence be encouraged, condoned, or celebrated to further the cause for life? No, and no.”

What we see here are two totally separate questions that should not be asked together; this is done to try to tie the two things together, which is unfair. Of course we should not condone violence or celebrate it. The problem is that later in the article you see the author try to tie the civil disobedience in Question 1 with the violence in Question 2.

So lets talk about Question 1: “Should breaking the law be advocated to advance the cause for life?” I want to rephrase this question to go past abortion, as it does say “cause for life”. The question would then read, “Should breaking the law ever have been advocated to advance causes like the Underground Railroad, hiding Jews during the Nazi Holocaust, the sit-ins during the Civil Rights Movement, rescuing young girls trapped in sex slavery, and rescuing children from abortion?”

When we rephrase the question and don’t try and tie the action of civil disobedience to violence, it shines a whole new light on the situation. The fact is that there are way too many times in the history of the world when corrupt governments passed evil, unjust laws that lead to the death, imprisonment and torture of our fellow human persons. There were also courageous men and women who peacefully broke those laws in order to save lives and change the world.

Continue reading…

Related Posts

Tags: pro-life protests
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2011-10-24 23:46:002021-11-08 12:53:59What about civil disobedience?
You might also like
Speech: Monica Snyder at the Walk for Life West Coast 2014
Support Iowa babies and Students for Life
So an atheist walks into Summer of Mercy…
SecularProLife.org featured in the Princeton Tory
Encouraging secular participation.
2017 Walk for Life recap
Pro-Life Freedom Rides
Walk for Life West Coast 2013
3 replies
  1. Jameson Graber
    Jameson Graber says:
    October 25, 2011 at 1:08 am

    I agree with Kemper that civil disobedience should be kept open as an option. We simply have to judge on a case by case basis what message we will send and/or what we will gain by a given act.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:
    October 25, 2011 at 7:57 pm

    I am not a religious person, but I am interested in understanding rational pro-life arguments (against abortion without religious dogma). I discovered SecularProLife and have been drawn to Jewels Green’s articles because they offer a convert’s view from “inside the sausage factory” which makes for a good read. I’m intrigued by her story and it has made me re-examine some of my assumptions.

    I have always been pro-choice* and secular. Call me an agnostic, atheist, skeptic, godless heathen – I really don’t care. Just don’t call me a “secular-humanist” or a “naturalist” as I do not drive a clown car, vote Democratic, or draw birds. If something requires a supernatural explanation, I’m not buying into it, or trusting the salesman.
    Sometimes the best policies make the best politics and Green’s article has it right- morally and politically. Reviewing reader comments such as: “The Magisterium vs. Catholic “common teaching” on lying, Bishop Chrysostom vs. Saints, the entire Body of Christ” and poster’s who sign off “God Bless” or “In Christ” has reinforced my belief that whatever a pro-life group calls itself, you are really a religious faction with or without a nom de guerre.

    I understand that (but not how) many good people hold heartfelt religious views that equate abortion with murder. This is intrinsically dangerous as one can justify almost any action to prevent murder. I believe there is a very fine line between civil disobedience and mob rule. Fortunately, Americans have due process and democratic political outlets as well as countless legal ways to express our opinions. If you are really winning hearts and minds, (and according to the poll Ms. Green quoted in her article and the links to this website, you have already won) why not just wait for the next election and send abortion back to the alleys where it belongs!

    Violence, which is the only possible outcome of what Kemper advocates, is not justified in a free society when we have peaceful alternatives, like state and national elections every 2 years.

    Kemper says “many times in the history of the world when corrupt governments passed evil, unjust laws that lead to the death, imprisonment and torture of our fellow human persons” The same could be said about corrupt churches. Our government is not perfect, but I prefer it to mob rule, or a theocracy. Nazi references will not endear many people to your cause and chaining yourselves in a door way is not the moral equivalent to hiding Anne Frank.

    *I do not support late term elective abortions or public financing and I am re-examining my position based on scientific evidence.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Kelsey
    Kelsey says:
    October 26, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    Hi Nest of Salt,

    Anyone can comment on this blog, and non-members are sometimes led here by links on pro-life religious sites. To get a better idea of SPL's membership, I hope you'll check out our facebook page. You'll find a link in the top left-hand corner.

    I do not believe that violence is the only possible outcome of what Kemper advocates. History gives us many successful examples of peaceful civil disobedience. Nevertheless, it may not be right for this time and place. Like I said, this is open for debate.

    I'm glad you've enjoyed Jewels' insights, and that you're keeping an open mind based on the scientific evidence. We hope you'll stick around.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Defining Victory Video: the facts on the abortion pill
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.