Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Why NARAL is mad at President Obama

February 13, 2014/5 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard
Judge Boggs

NARAL has been flooding my Facebook feed with paid advertisements for a petition to thwart the nomination of Judge Michael Boggs to the federal bench. This is a little strange, since you may recall from high school civics class that federal judges are nominated by the President; you might also recall that the current President of the United States is such a diehard abortion supporter that he was unwilling to get on board with the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act. So what’s going on here?

According to NARAL, when Boggs was a Georgia state legislator more than a decade ago, he “tried
to channel funds to anti-choice crisis pregnancy centers and make a
parental consent law even more extreme.” In oldspeak, that means that Boggs 1) supported the creation of a Choose Life license plate, which facilitates pro-life people donating their own money to pro-life causes, and 2) supported a requirement that minor girls be accompanied to the abortion facility by a parent. It’s worth noting that this parent-must-accompany rule is designed to combat sexual abuse.

So the pro-choice lobby is twisting the facts, which is hardly news. But this quote by NARAL president Ilyse Hogue blew me away with its sheer nonsensical stupidity:

“Michael Boggs actually believes that there is one definition of what it
means to live your life as an American. The thing is, that’s
anti-American,” NARAL President Ilyse Hogue said in a statement. “We
cannot risk having someone like that on the bench when we know we have
so many cases coming down the pike that will define the very fabric of
who we are as a nation and we are not only a nation that supports
diversity, but we’re actually a pro-choice nation.”

What. The. Hell?

First of all, no rational human being would make the leap from “X supports Choose Life plates and parental consent laws” to “X believes that he is the arbiter of what it means to be an American.” What makes this really rich is that Hogue then goes on to “define what it means to live your life as an American” when she declares, wrongly, that America is “a pro-choice nation.” Seriously, does she even read her statements before she sends them to the press?

The truth, of course, is that NARAL is very much in the minority. In particular, 60% of pro-choicers support parental consent laws.

I have a theory about what’s really going on here. Boggs is a pro-life Democrat. The abortion movement has a deep interest in maintaining its stranglehold on the Democratic Party, which will become harder to do as the Millennial generation ages into positions of influence. NARAL is willing to spend a good deal of money to send a message to Obama: maintain your party’s pro-abortion ideological purity, or suffer the consequences.

Related Posts

Tags: NARAL
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2014-02-13 12:12:002021-11-08 12:32:22Why NARAL is mad at President Obama
You might also like
NARAL’s next line of attack against pregnancy centers
Pro-choice groups say subway ads are a form of intimidation
NARAL applauds censorship of abortion alternatives leader
NARAL believes pro-lifers are winning the online messaging battle
NRLC and NARAL agree
Why did you convert to the pro-life side?
Behind Enemy Lines: Undercover at a NARAL training session
Three Major News Items Today
5 replies
  1. CuriousMinds
    CuriousMinds says:
    February 13, 2014 at 12:40 pm

    I'm curious about how Obama ended up nominating a prolifer. There's gotta be something going on there…

    As a non-Catholic prolifer, I actually see one similarity between Ilyse Hogue's rhetoric and the most extreme of the Catholic stuff, which bleeds through sometimes on lifesitenews: it reads like it comes from deep within a well-padded echo chamber; the speakers/writers have lost touch with how it comes across to mainstream Americans. They're preaching to their choirs, while the rest of us think, "What. The. Hell?" Amanda Marcotte is another one. Same effect is seen in New Atheists, and in those Young Earth Creationists that attended the Nye-Ham debate and posted pictures of their questions on Buzzfeed. Their echo chambers' gene pools are just waaaaay too thin.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Janet Susan
    Janet Susan says:
    February 13, 2014 at 1:46 pm

    NARAL's little world is becoming even smaller. Tsk-tsk.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Drew Hymer
    Drew Hymer says:
    February 13, 2014 at 2:42 pm

    i'm having a hard time believing that Obama would pick anyone who isn't an full supporter of prenatal baby-killing.

    Log in to Reply
  4. Vita
    Vita says:
    February 13, 2014 at 8:40 pm

    Me too but I am happily surprised by it.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Rachel Anne Enders
    Rachel Anne Enders says:
    February 25, 2014 at 10:07 pm

    Lifesitenews

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Secularists and Pro-lifers, Unite! So I met some sidewalk counselors.
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.