Secular Pro-Life
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Terms and Conditions
      • Opt-out preferences
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
      • Biology
      • Debunking
      • Dialogue strategy
      • Later Abortion
      • Legislation, laws, & court cases
      • Religion
      • We Asked You Answered
      • Your Stories
    • Research
      • What counts as an “abortion”?
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
    • Videos
      • Debunking
      • Livestream Replays
    • Collections
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Prenatal Diagnoses
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Ask An Atheist
      • LGBTQ and Pro-Life
      • Fixed that meme for you
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas (e-book)
      • Overview of SPL (brochure)
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (brochure)
      • 3 reasons to tell people you’re pro-life (flyer)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (brochure)
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion (flyer)
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum (e-book)
      • Fetal Remains Disposition Protocol
      • FAQ (flyer)
      • Presentations overview (card)
    • Presentations
      • Bridges Intensive
      • Building Bridges
      • Secular Post-Abortion Healing
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Don’t Feed The Trolls
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
    • Store
  • Contact
    • General Inquiries
    • Media Inquiries
    • Book a Speaker
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
      • Your experiences with adoption
      • Your experiences with processing abortion
      • Pro-Life Medical Professionals survey
  • Speakers
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
Kelsey Hazzard

Explainer: Supreme Court Ruling on Texas Heartbeat Law

September 2, 2021/0 Comments/in Legislation, laws, & court cases /by Kelsey Hazzard

(This content is also available as a Facebook post and Twitter thread.)

Your resident lawyer Kelsey here. I am going to try my best to explain the Supreme Court’s order in the Texas case, subject to revision when I’ve had more sleep.

First, it helps to understand what typically happens in abortion cases. A pro-life law is enacted, abortion industry interests sue, and the lower (district and circuit) federal courts enjoin (block) enforcement of the law while it works its way through the system. The Supreme Court does not get involved in the proceedings until much later, if ever. 

You can think of this pattern as creating two types of precedent. (1) The Supreme Court declines to get involved in abortion cases early on, letting lower courts run the show. Let’s call that the “procedural precedent.” (2) Plaintiffs get to keep killing unborn babies in abortions without regard to the law while the case is ongoing. Let’s call that the “substantive precedent.”

What makes the Texas case different is that the lower courts did NOT enjoin the law. The reasons for that are complicated but have to do with the unique citizen-led enforcement mechanism. So the procedural and substantive precedents counseled different results. 

Five Justices went with the procedural precedent, basically saying that it’s too early for the Supreme Court to get involved. They wrote that this doesn’t mean they are declaring the law constitutional or not; they are simply letting the lower courts handle it.

By contrast, the four Justices in the minority, who took the substantive route, wrote angry opinions decrying the impact on women’s so-called “right” to abortion, plainly rejecting Texas’s argument that babies in the womb have a right to life. Those four Justices have made their bias plain: they will never vote to correct the Court’s mistake in Roe.

The ultimate fate of the Texas law remains unclear. But for now, about a hundred babies a day are getting a reprieve.

To help, donate to a Texas pregnancy resource center! We especially love Abide Women’s Health Services.

Related posts:

  1. The Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments in Texas Heartbeat Act Case
  2. Indiana Supreme Court Has Chance to Fix Disastrous Ruling
  3. No, Texas maternal mortality didn’t “skyrocket” after heartbeat law
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2021-09-02 11:49:002021-11-24 17:22:37Explainer: Supreme Court Ruling on Texas Heartbeat Law
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • Debunking
  • Dialogue strategy
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Livestream Recaps
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2026 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup
How Supreme Court case June Medical v. Russo may have set up pro-lifers for... TOMORROW: Join SPL Virtually at the Rehumanize Conference!
Scroll to top
Media Inquiries

Subscribe for Livestream Updates and More

* indicates required

Interests