Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Politics happened, and stuff

November 5, 2014/7 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

Yesterday was an election day. That’s all that anyone’s going to be talking about today. And that makes things a little tricky for us, since A) SPL isn’t really involved in electoral politics (because we’re non-partisan, and also we couldn’t afford to organize a 501(c)(4) even if we wanted to), and B) we generally write our blog posts a day or two before they’re published (because we’re volunteers, with lives and jobs).

Election coverage is what y’all want, and we can’t provide it. So enjoy this random picture of a very happy seagull, and we’ll be back on Friday.

AND he didn’t have to listen to any campaign ads. Lucky guy.

P.S.: Here’s election coverage from other pro-life organizations.
Americans United for Life
Susan B. Anthony List
National Right to Life

Related Posts

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/IMG_3226.jpg?fit=1200%2C1600&ssl=1 1600 1200 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2014-11-05 12:24:002021-11-08 12:27:17Politics happened, and stuff
7 replies
  1. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    November 6, 2014 at 6:18 pm

    In the previous thread, a poster took issue with what she felt was
    a sweeping generalization that the mainstream pro-life is generally
    anti-science and anti-civil-rights for LGBT. She claimed that there
    were in fact many pro-lifers who are very pro-science and pro-LGBT,
    but that these people do not fit into the liberal narrative, so they
    media ignores them. Well, aside from the fact that the conservative
    media also doesn't hi-light these people, I felt I should use my lunch
    hour delve into this issue a bit.

    I freely acknowledge that there are some pro-lifers who are secular
    and oppose abortion for what they feels is a real violation of rights
    of the unborn, the ones who are visible and can influence policy, and
    they get my full respect. However, politicians are mainstream pro-lifers
    who have the power to influence social policy. I felt it instructive
    to see whether among these people, pro-life really does correlate well
    with what progressives feel are anti-intellectual, anti-science stances.

    Looking at the positions taken by US state governors on
    http://governor.ontheissues.org/Governor/Governor.htm

    I looked at 4 issues.

    1) Pro-life (1 = Pro-choice)

    2) LGBT rights/Same-sex Marriage support (1 = Support)

    3) Church/state separation, no prayer in public school (1 = Support)

    4) Man-made climate change, environmental regulations (1 = Support)

    ISSUES 1 2 3 4
    ————————————–
    Neil Abercrombie(HI) R 0 1 1 1

    Jerry Brown(CA) D 0 1 1 1

    Pat Quinn(IL) D 0 1 ? 1

    Steve Beshear(KY) D 0 1 1 1
    ————————————–

    Robert Bentley (AL) R 1 0 0 0

    Butch Otter(ID) R 1 0 0 0

    Rick Scott(FL) R 1 0 0 0

    Nathan Deal(GA) R 1 0 0 0

    Bobby Jindal(LA) R 1 0 0 0

    Paul LePage(ME) R 1 0 ? 0

    Rick Snyder(MI) R 1 0 ? ? (climate change, but humans not cause. LGBT Civil Union OK)

    Susana Martinez(NM) R 1 0 ? 0

    Brian Sandoval(NV) R 0 0(CU) ? 1? (RARE pro-choice Repub. LGBT Civil Union OK. Seems to be an environmental conservationist)

    I realize this is not a full sampling, but I feel these governors are a reasonably representative
    sampling. From this chart, it appears that there is a strong correlation. Pro-choice governors
    pretty much always support LGBT civil rights, church-state separation and man-made climate change
    and environmental regulations, while pro-life candidates almost always oppose those.

    Why is this important?

    As children, we believed in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy. As we got older and got exposed to
    the wider world, those beliefs were abandoned. Polls show that holders of advanced degrees are
    almost 2x as likely to hold pro-choice beliefs than pro-life beliefs, while holders of high school
    diplomas, the ratios are switched. Conversely, belief in Creationism is very similar. Advanced
    degree, you are highly unlikely to be a Creationist, while high school diploma, you are much more
    likely to be a Creationist. If one believes in 1 crazy or irrational idea, it is also likely that
    person believes in another irrational or crazy idea, because that person probably doesn't have the
    mental tools make good decisions whether an idea is crazy or irrational.

    Would you trust an adult to be able to make good decisions about life in general if that adult
    still believed in Santa Claus? What if that adult rejects outright evidence based science about
    climate change, or that gays make decent parents? If that adult also is strongly pro-life, do you
    think they arrived at their pro-life position through rational thought?

    Log in to Reply
  2. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    November 6, 2014 at 8:09 pm

    The first post here was for looking at the stance of current State Governors. A similar look at the pro-life politicians endorsed by The Susan B. Anthony List also appears to follow a similar pattern. Pro-life candidates are very against LGBT marriage and for "religious liberty" discrimination against gays, are against initiatives that try to stem climate change, and are against church-state separation.

    Log in to Reply
  3. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    November 6, 2014 at 9:30 pm

    Good work compiling that list.

    Log in to Reply
  4. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    November 6, 2014 at 11:45 pm

    Thanks, its striking how strongly pro-life stance correlates with stances that are so reactionary and ignorant of reality.

    Log in to Reply
  5. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    November 6, 2014 at 11:52 pm

    It's for a couple of reasons…and I really really need to search this information down so that I can cite it in the future

    1) the original arguments made against abortion had nothing to do with fetal life, in fact, it was all about female *chastity*, and how abortion – related to contraception – would enable women to be sluts, and that just wouldn't do

    2) abortion replaced the southern strategy as a way to rally the religious right – and the fetus became the moral center of the abortion debate, when prior to that, it had been the woman, and in fact, in 1974, both conservatives and liberals, including Protestants, supported abortion rights and even contraception. The last 40 years of opposition to abortion and even contraception has been a rallying cry to get the religious right together under one roof (the GOP) and lead them to victory

    Log in to Reply
  6. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    November 7, 2014 at 12:09 am

    It is a shame, the rise of the Religious Right.

    The abortion debate does have genuine merits on both sides of the issue, but I don't think the RR is capable of having honest discussions about anything because in the end – god. Trash the environment, its OK, earthly existence is only temporary. Abortion – a fetus is a gift of god. God hates fags. Evolution puts us on the same foothold as monkeys, and that is an insult to God as we're made in his own image. End of discussion.

    Log in to Reply
  7. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    November 7, 2014 at 5:07 am

    Purple, my own religious opinion is that any religion that focuses on their dislike of gays, or abortion (or both) is very seriously flawed. Because offering hate objects is a very easy sell to most people. Most people are mentally and spiritually lazy, and would rather buy into the easy path of feeling holier-than-thou compared to the offered hate object, than actually working at improving their own moral character (which is painful and hard work and therefore not an easy sell). And to the extent that you are focussing your religious energy on other people's sex lives, (or other people at all for that matter), you are NOT focussing it on yourself, your own flaws, improving those flaws, or your own relationship with God.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Bookmark this video Working it Out: Audience Participation Requested!
Scroll to top
Want to join our mailing list?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.