Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

What is choice?

January 21, 2011/2 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

Today is NARAL’s “Blog for Choice” day. The pro-life response is to insist upon clarity. What do you mean by choice?

Just as an experiment, I recorded all the choices that I made for a day. For someone who supposedly can’t stand women making their own choices, I made a ton: what to wear, what to read, what flavor of ice cream to buy at the grocery store. I even made a medical choice involving my body, when I chose to get my allergy shot. I chose to obey all traffic laws– although, arguably, that choice was made for me by the government. This “anti-choice” advocate eventually made so many choices that she lost count.

Of course, that isn’t what’s meant when NARAL talks about freedom of choice. But is it fair to say that “choice” simply means “abortion”?

The response from those who identify themselves as “pro-choice” is usually no. They would say that “choice” means support for abortion, adoption, and parenting. Okay. I’ll accept that definition at face value. Just realize that it’s equally damning. What if I said that I was pro-choice: it’s up to you if you want to murder your grandma, place her in a rest home, or allow her to live with your family? Would you call me pro-grandma-murder? I certainly wouldn’t blame you.

When people say that they support abortion, adoption, and parenting, the last two choices are really beside the point, because no one– pro-life or pro-choice– has a problem with people choosing between adoption and parenting. It’s like a politician who says he’ll be tough on crime; I’ve yet to see anyone campaign on a platform of support for criminals!

Let’s be clear. The choice that’s being debated is the choice to either give birth or have an abortion. From the perspective of NARAL and its allies, that’s the choice between allowing a child to come into being, or getting rid of “tissue.” From our perspective, the child has already come into being, so the choice is between a live baby and a dead baby. Now we can get down to the core issue: the humanity, or non-humanity, of the unborn child (a scientific question), and what rights attach (a legal question).

I’ll close with a comment from Dr. Bernard Nathanson:

“Women must have control over their own bodies.”

“Safe and legal abortion is every woman’s right.”

“Who decides? You decide!”

“Freedom of choice — a basic American right.”

. . .

“I remember laughing when we made those slogans up,” recalls Bernard Nathanson, M.D., co-founder of pro-abortion group NARAL, reminiscing about the early days of the pro-abortion movement in the late ’60s and early ’70s.

“We were looking for some sexy, catchy slogans to capture public opinion. They were very cynical slogans then, just as all of these slogans today are very, very cynical.”

Related Posts

Tags: sex education & contraception
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://i0.wp.com/secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/blogforchoice.jpg?fit=141%2C200&ssl=1 200 141 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2011-01-21 15:33:002021-11-08 12:57:05What is choice?
You might also like
The truth about North Carolina’s new sex ed legislation
You can be pro-life and pro-contraception. Most of us are!
Great Things in North Dakota!!!
Pro-life student prompts review of unconstitutional speech policy
Pro-choice states have just as many unintended pregnancies, and far more abortions
Pro-abortion group: Let’s get away from discussing abortion
Get Your Vending Machine Abortion
Common Ground – Your Rights
2 replies
  1. Anonymous
    Anonymous says:
    January 25, 2011 at 3:50 am

    Of course, it's about abortion. Otherwise, they would not call us anti-choicers for our opposition to abortion as murder. They are not calling us anti-choicers if we oppose right to do other forms of murder, rape, incest, assault, battery, robbery, theft, etc., etc.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Pantheroom
    Pantheroom says:
    January 25, 2011 at 6:19 am

    This post really hit the nail on the head regarding the phrase "anti-choice" (anti-abortion). I was just telling Monica yesterday (before I read this):
    ‎" "against a women's right to choose" = "against women's right to make this specific choice that kills people". Seriously. With that kind of rhetoric, *all* laws "turn against a women's right to choose" as laws tend to limit choices!
    Further…more, considering it would enable thousands more baby girls to be born and make choices in life, doesn't it allow more choices to women than it takes away? I mean really, how many choices do you think the average female makes in her life? Killing her would prrrobably limit her choices more than banning abortion for most women."

    Looks like we're on the same page!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Americans United for Life’s 2011 Rankings Walk for Life West Coast 2011
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.