Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview Brochure
      • FAQ
      • Why Secular People Should Care
      • Tell People You’re Pro-Life
      • Bridges
      • Presentation Overview card
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Things we missed over Thanksgiving break

November 28, 2010/8 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Kelsey Hazzard

LifeNews.com highlights a 2008 Guttmacher Institute report, stating that 300 American abortionists are willing to kill babies older than 20 weeks LMP (18 weeks after fertilization). Though the Guttmacher Institute has a pro-abortion agenda and mixes a strong dose of propaganda into its reports, the raw data is often beneficial to the pro-life cause.
The baby in the above video is at least two weeks under the age limit for the abortionists in the report.

In Alaska, Planned Parenthood is suing to prevent a recently passed parental notification law from going into effect. Parental notification laws have already been found constitutional many times, but for abortion businesses, delay is victory. Just look at what’s happening in Illinois!

Related Posts

Tags: abortion providers, late-term abortion, parental notification, Planned Parenthood
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Kelsey Hazzard https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Kelsey Hazzard2010-11-28 22:27:002021-11-08 12:57:50Things we missed over Thanksgiving break
You might also like
Will there be justice in Kansas?
Recap: SPL at #ProtestPP San Jose
Planned Parenthood is Pro-Abortion, Not Pro-Choice
Abortion “counseling” is really a sales pitch
BREAKING: Komen Announced End of Funding to Planned Parenthood
Life after Gosnell
Assorted news
Komen Giving to Planned Parenthood?
8 replies
  1. Yonmei
    Yonmei says:
    November 30, 2010 at 9:38 am

    Only three hundred American doctors brave enough to defy the pro-life terrorists who want women to die when complications develop in late pregnancy?

    That's both shameful – for the pro-life movement and for the doctors not brave enough to defy their terrorism – and impressive. Good there are that many doctors who put their patients lives and wellbeing ahead of their own.

    Log in to Reply
  2. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    December 1, 2010 at 12:29 am

    Gee, look who's back. Still under the the impression that pro-lifers support violence and that elective late-term abortions are never, ever, ever done. Ever.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Yonmei
    Yonmei says:
    December 1, 2010 at 8:10 am

    Still under the the impression that pro-lifers support violence

    From pro-lifers themselves: you do.

    and that elective late-term abortions are never, ever, ever done. Ever.

    Oh, Nulono. Still trying to claim that when a woman in late pregnancy develops complications and has to choose between death for herself & the fetus or an abortion, that's "elective". Because who cares about saving a woman's life if she can't give birth to a living baby!

    Isn't it ironic what prolifers call themselves, anyone would think they cared about human life…

    Log in to Reply
  4. Yonmei
    Yonmei says:
    December 1, 2010 at 8:20 am

    Just as an example: Neal Horsley, the pro-lifer who publishes names and addresses of doctors, clinic staff, and volunteers, so that wannabe "heroes" of the pro-life movement can kill them. (He's also violently homophobic, but that almost goes without saying – he's a pro-lifer, bigotry against gays and women go together.)

    Of course no prolifer would dream of denouncing Neal Horsley in any detail: they might go "oh no we have nothing to do with him" but any idea that it's actually wrong to identify for harassment, persecution, and the threat of murder, doctors who are brave enough to perform late-term abortions… that's the way the pro-life movement in the US functions, with violence and harassment.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    December 1, 2010 at 11:46 am

    1. I'm not bigoted.
    2. Guilt by association. How lovely.

    Log in to Reply
  6. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    December 1, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    George Tiller himself cited fetal genetic health problems as the chief reason for performing late-term abortions, not maternal health. If a woman is in a life-threatening situation, she's going to go to a hospital.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    December 1, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    I'm not saying life-of-the-mother abortions are elective. I'm saying not every single late-term abortion IS a life-of-the-mother abortion.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Yonmei
    Yonmei says:
    December 1, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    George Tiller himself cited fetal genetic health problems as the chief reason for performing late-term abortions, not maternal health

    George Tiller wouldn't perform late-term abortions unless there was a threat to the mother's health.

    You prefer a woman would have to wait for her fetus to die inside her, then suffer through a miscarriage of the dead fetus. That would be a strong threat to her health, possibly her life, and her future fertility. But that's what you want, and you support violence and harassment and murder of doctors who want to save women's health, lives, and future fertility.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

We gave a lecture where?! Abortions during the holidays
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.