Secular Pro-Life
  • Home
  • About
    • Meet The Team
    • Mission and Vision
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Stances
      • Abortion
      • Religion
      • Contraception
      • The Rape Exception
    • Privacy
  • Content
    • Index
    • Blog
    • Presentations
      • A Secular Case Against Abortion
      • Building Bridges
      • Deconstructing Three Pro-Choice Myths
      • Overlooked Findings of the Turnaway Study
    • Research
      • Abortion Law and Abortion Rates
      • Abortion Law and Pregnancy Rates
      • Later Abortion
      • Embryonic Hearts
      • Abortion Views and Gender
    • Collections
      • For the biology textbook tells me so
      • They can hear you
      • Parents can hear you
      • Our children’s heartbeats
      • Becoming Pro-Life
      • Ask An Atheist
      • Fixed that meme for you
    • Print Materials
      • 100 Pro-Life Sign Ideas
      • Overview of SPL
      • 3 Reasons to tell people you’re pro-life
      • How to talk (not fight) about abortion
      • Bridges PRC Curriculum
      • FAQ
      • Presentations overview
    • Store
  • Contact
  • Get Involved
    • Why support SPL?
    • Donor Opportunities
    • Volunteer Opportunities
    • Volunteer Survey
    • More Surveys
      • Why do you support SPL?
      • Best and Worst Abortion Arguments
      • “Ask An Atheist” Interview
      • Non-Traditional Pro-Life Survey
      • LGBT Pro-Life Survey
      • Parents experiences with prenatal screening
  • Donate
  • Menu Menu

Quick News Roundup 07/30/10

July 30, 2010/5 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Matthew Newman
Happy Friday. Here’s your weekly news roundup.

Domestic News: A State Senator in Texas is looking to defund Planned Parenthood. How? According to State Senator Robert Deuell, it’s unconstitutional. In a letter he drafted earlier this week to the Texas Attorney General’s office, he outlined his case. You can read his letter here. Congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey has proposed the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act.” What does it do? Exactly what it says – it would establish a government-wide policy prohibiting any funding of abortion. It may not see the light of day under current Speaker Pelosi, but after the mid-term elections, hopefully Congress will be a little more friendly to pro-life legislation. As I reported last week, Nebraska‘s new abortion regulations requiring pre-abortion mental health screening was blocked by a judge. Nebraska’s Attorney General is not prepared to defend it. AG Jon Bruning said that he was unsure if it was worth the taxpayer’s dime to defend this law as he was unsure if he could win. He said, “Despite the fact I’m very pro-life, I need to be realistic in utilizing the legal resources of the state.” He felt it may be more beneficial to redraft the legislation to alleviate the court’s issues.

International News: For those interested, I found a recent article which I didn’t read in full – BUT, it provides us with an interesting image – the legality of abortion across the globe. Here’s a copy of that map:

Discussion Topic: Roe v. Wade sparked into existence the pro-life movement. Have you ever read the court’s decision? Or the dissenting opinion? This site has a lot of that information, I specifically linked to Rehnquist’s dissent, which I find to be the most compelling. How about you?

Related Posts

Tags: international issues, Planned Parenthood
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png 0 0 Matthew Newman https://secularprolife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SecularProlife2.png Matthew Newman2010-07-30 13:07:002021-11-08 12:59:38Quick News Roundup 07/30/10
You might also like
The good, the bad, and the ugly in the Senate health care bill
Planned Parenthood’s child abuse scandals continue
#ProtestPP returns on April 28
Planned Parenthood Not Attacking New Pro-Life Bills?
“Talking about my abortion.”
New Undercover Footage Coming from Live Action
An open letter to Planned Parenthood
Australian pro-life advocate assaulted
5 replies
  1. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    July 30, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    I find it very interesting that the dissent does not reference the right to life of the unborn.

    Log in to Reply
  2. secularprolife.org
    secularprolife.org says:
    July 31, 2010 at 11:03 am

    I don't think the statement that "Roe v. Wade sparked into existence the pro-life movement" is accurate. Things certainly got much more serious at that point. But we were around, fighting pro-abortion legislation at the state level and running the charities which were precursors to modern-day pregnancy clinics.

    As a law student, I've had to read Roe, and Blackmun's talk about "THEORIES of when life begins" always makes my head come close to exploding. This must be how evolutionary biologists feel when evolution is criticized as "just a theory."

    Log in to Reply
  3. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    July 31, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    So "legal on request" is denoted by gray, "varies by region" is denoted by gray, and "illegal with no exceptions" is denoted by gray. Very helpful!

    Log in to Reply
  4. Nulono
    Nulono says:
    August 1, 2010 at 6:00 pm

    "Congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey has proposed the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act." What does it do? Exactly what it says – it would establish a government-wide policy prohibiting any funding of abortion."

    This is not accurate; it provides no protection against being forced to fund incest and rape abortions.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Matthew Newman
    Matthew Newman says:
    August 2, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    secularprolife: As a massive, national powerhouse movement – I'd say the Roe decision really kick started the pro-life movement. Pre-Roe, the pro-life movement was mostly locally run or, if it was coordinated, it was through primarily religious outlets. Now, the pro-life movement exists en masse on a national level (ex. the NRLC was founded post-Roe).

    So, you're right – it didn't spark it into existence – but it definitely kick started things and made it into a more coordinated, national movement.

    Nulono: I didn't know that it paid for rape / incest abortions. I assumed the "life of the mother" exemption, but that one I was not sure about.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow via Email

* indicates required

Categories

  • Ableism
  • Abortion pills
  • Administrative
  • Adoption & Foster Care
  • Biology
  • Bodily Rights
  • en español
  • Later Abortion
  • Legislation, laws, & court cases
  • Miscarriage & Pregnancy Loss
  • Personhood
  • Philosophy
  • Pro-Life Demographics
  • Rape Exception
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Speeches, Discussions, Presentations
  • SPL Emails
  • They Can Hear You
  • Top SPL Articles
  • Top SPL Graphics
  • Uncategorized
  • We Asked You Answered
  • Year In Review
  • Your Stories

Archive

It’s crucial that we demonstrate that anyone can–and everyone should–oppose abortion. Thanks to you, we are working to change minds, transform our culture, and protect our prenatal children. Every donation supports our ability to provide nonsectarian, nonpartisan arguments against abortion. Read more details here. Please donate today.

DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
© Copyright 2025 Secular Pro-Life. All rights reserved. Website Design by TandarichGroup

Related Posts

Traveling Pro-lifers in Congress get busy
Scroll to top
Want to receive our email newsletter?

We’d be happy to keep in touch. Subscribe for access to our newsletter and other updates.